Although advances such as chain-of-thought, tree-of-thought or reinforcement learning have improved the performance of LLMs in reasoning and planning tasks, they are still brittle and have not achieved human-level performance in many domains, and often suffer from high time and token costs. Inspired by the success of width-based search in planning, we explore how the concept of novelty can be transferred to language domains and how it can improve tree-of-thought reasoning. A tree of thoughts relies on building possible"paths"of consecutive ideas or thoughts. These are generated by repeatedly prompting an LLM. In our paper, a measurable concept of novelty is proposed that describes the uniqueness of a new node (thought) in comparison to nodes previously seen in the search tree. Novelty is estimated by prompting an LLM and making use of embedded general knowledge from pre-training. This metric can then be used to prune branches and reduce the scope of the search. Although this method introduces more prompts per state, the overall token cost can be reduced by pruning and reducing the overall tree size. This procedure is tested and compared using several benchmarks in language-based planning and general reasoning.

Traditional Task and Motion Planning (TAMP) systems depend on physics models for motion planning and discrete symbolic models for task planning. Although physics model are often available, symbolic models (consisting of symbolic state interpretation and action models) must be meticulously handcrafted or learned from labeled data. This process is both resource-intensive and constrains the solution to the specific domain, limiting scalability and adaptability. On the other hand, Visual Language Models (VLMs) show desirable zero-shot visual understanding (due to their extensive training on heterogeneous data), but still achieve limited planning capabilities. Therefore, integrating VLMs with classical planning for long-horizon reasoning in TAMP problems offers high potential. Recent works in this direction still lack generality and depend on handcrafted, task-specific solutions, e.g. describing all possible objects in advance, or using symbolic action models. We propose a framework that generalizes well to unseen problem instances. The method requires only lifted predicates describing relations among objects and uses VLMs to ground them from images to obtain the symbolic state. Planning is performed with domain-independent heuristic search using goal-count and width-based heuristics, without need for action models. Symbolic search over VLM-grounded state-space outperforms direct VLM-based planning and performs on par with approaches that use a VLM-derived heuristic. This shows that domain-independent search can effectively solve problems across domains with large combinatorial state spaces. We extensively evaluate on extensively evaluate our method and achieve state-of-the-art results on the ProDG and ViPlan benchmarks.

Learning from demonstration (LfD) has proved useful for teaching robots complex skills with high sample efficiency. However, teaching long-horizon tasks with multiple skills is challenging as deviations tend to accumulate, the distributional shift becomes more evident, and human teachers become fatigued over time, thereby increasing the likelihood of failure. To address these challenges, we introduce $(ST{)}^{2},$ a sequential method for learning long-horizon manipulation tasks that allows users to control teaching flow by specifying keypoints, enabling structured and incremental demonstrations. Using this framework, we study how users respond to two teaching paradigms: 1) a traditional monolithic approach in which users demonstrate the entire task trajectory at once, and 2) a sequential approach, in which the task is segmented and demonstrated step by step. We conducted an extensive user study on the restocking task with 16 participants in a realistic retail store environment, evaluating the user preferences and effectiveness of the methods. A user-level analysis showed superior performance for the sequential approach in most cases (10 users), compared with the monolithic approach (five users), with one tie. Our subjective results indicate that some teachers prefer sequential teaching—as it allows them to teach complicated tasks iteratively—or others prefer teaching in one go due to its simplicity.

Human teaching effort is a significant bottleneck for the broader applicability of interactive imitation learning. To reduce the number of required queries, existing methods employ active learning to query the human teacher only in uncertain, risky, or novel situations. However, during these queries, the novice's planned actions are not utilized despite containing valuable information, such as the novice's capabilities, as well as corresponding uncertainty levels. To this end, we allow the novice to say:"I plan to do this, but I am uncertain."We introduce the Active Skill-level Data Aggregation (ASkDAgger) framework, which leverages teacher feedback on the novice plan in three key ways: (1) S-Aware Gating (SAG): Adjusts the gating threshold to track sensitivity, specificity, or a minimum success rate; (2) Foresight Interactive Experience Replay (FIER), which recasts valid and relabeled novice action plans into demonstrations; and (3) Prioritized Interactive Experience Replay (PIER), which prioritizes replay based on uncertainty, novice success, and demonstration age. Together, these components balance query frequency with failure incidence, reduce the number of required demonstration annotations, improve generalization, and speed up adaptation to changing domains. We validate the effectiveness of ASkDAgger through language-conditioned manipulation tasks in both simulation and real-world environments. Code, data, and videos are available at https://askdagger.github.io.

This work proposes a motion planning algorithm for robotic manipulators that combines sampling-based and search-based planning methods. The core contribution of the proposed approach is the usage of burs of free configuration space ($\mathcal{C}$-space) as adaptive motion primitives within the graph search algorithm. Due to their feature to adaptively expand in free $\mathcal{C}$-space, burs enable more efficient exploration of the configuration space compared to fixed-sized motion primitives, significantly reducing the time to find a valid path and the number of required expansions. The algorithm is implemented within the existing SMPL (Search-Based Motion Planning Library) library and evaluated through a series of different scenarios involving manipulators with varying number of degrees-of-freedom (DoF) and environment complexity. Results demonstrate that the bur-based approach outperforms fixed-primitive planning in complex scenarios, particularly for high DoF manipulators, while achieving comparable performance in simpler scenarios.

Autonomous Vehicle decisions rely on multimodal prediction models that account for multiple route options and the inherent uncertainty in human behavior. However, models can suffer from mode collapse, where only the most likely mode is predicted, posing significant safety risks. While existing methods employ various strategies to generate diverse predictions, they often overlook the diversity in interaction modes among agents. Additionally, traditional metrics for evaluating prediction models are dataset-dependent and do not evaluate inter-agent interactions quantitatively. To our knowledge, none of the existing metrics explicitly evaluates mode collapse. In this paper, we propose a novel evaluation framework that assesses mode collapse in joint trajectory predictions, focusing on safety-critical interactions. We introduce metrics for mode collapse, mode correctness, and coverage, emphasizing the sequential dimension of predictions. By testing four multi-agent trajectory prediction models, we demonstrate that mode collapse indeed happens. When looking at the sequential dimension, although prediction accuracy improves closer to interaction events, there are still cases where the models are unable to predict the correct interaction mode, even just before the interaction mode becomes inevitable. We hope that our framework can help researchers gain new insights and advance the development of more consistent and accurate prediction models, thus enhancing the safety of autonomous driving systems.

Developing decision-making algorithms for highly automated driving systems remains challenging, since these systems have to operate safely in an open and complex environments. Reinforcement Learning (RL) approaches can learn comprehensive decision policies directly from experience and already show promising results in simple driving tasks. However, current approaches fail to achieve generalizability for more complex driving tasks and lack learning efficiency. Therefore, we present Scenario-based Automated Driving Reinforcement Learning (SAD-RL), the first framework that integrates Reinforcement Learning (RL) of hierarchical policy in a scenario-based environment. A high-level policy selects maneuver templates that are evaluated and executed by a low-level control logic. The scenario-based environment allows to control the training experience for the agent and to explicitly introduce challenging, but rate situations into the training process. Our experiments show that an agent trained using the SAD-RL framework can achieve safe behaviour in easy as well as challenging situations efficiently. Our ablation studies confirmed that both HRL and scenario diversity are essential for achieving these results.

In this paper, we analyze examples of research institutes that stand out in scientific excellence and social impact. We define key practices for evaluating research results, economic conditions, and the selection of specific research topics. Special focus is placed on small countries and the field of artificial intelligence. The aim is to identify components that enable institutes to achieve a high level of innovation, self-sustainability, and social benefits.

Robot motion planning is a challenging domain as it involves dealing with high-dimensional and continuous search space. In past decades, a wide variety of planning algorithms have been developed to tackle this problem, sometimes in isolation without comparing to each other. In this study, we benchmark two such prominent types of algorithms: OMPL's sampling-based RRT-Connect and SMPL's search-based ARA* with motion primitives. To compare these two fundamentally different approaches fairly, we adapt them to ensure the same planning conditions and benchmark them on the same set of planning scenarios. Our findings suggest that sampling-based planners like RRT-Connect show more consistent performance across the board in high-dimensional spaces, whereas search-based planners like ARA* have the capacity to perform significantly better when used with a suitable action-space sampling scheme. Through this study, we hope to showcase the effort required to properly benchmark motion planners from different paradigms thereby contributing to a more nuanced understanding of their capabilities and limitations. The code is available at https://github.com/gsotirchos/benchmarking_planners

Heuristic search is often used for motion planning and pathfinding problems, for finding the shortest path in a graph while also promising completeness and optimal efficiency. The drawback is it's space complexity, specifically storing all expanded child nodes in memory and sorting large lists of active nodes, which can be a problem in real-time scenarios with limited on-board computation. To combat this, we present the Search with Learned Optimal Pruning-based Expansion (SLOPE), which, learns the distance of a node from a possible optimal path, unlike other approaches that learn a cost-to-go value. The unfavored nodes are then pruned according to the said distance, which in turn reduces the size of the open list. This ensures that the search explores only the region close to optimal paths while lowering memory and computational costs. Unlike traditional learning methods, our approach is orthogonal to estimating cost-to-go heuristics, offering a complementary strategy for improving search efficiency. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach evaluating it as a standalone search method and in conjunction with learned heuristic functions, achieving comparable-or-better node expansion metrics, while lowering the number of child nodes in the open list. Our code is available at https://github.com/dbokan1/SLOPE.