Discontinuation of antiepileptic therapy presents a challenge for physicians and patient. Many parameters play a role, and the doctor has to assess the relationship between benefits and any possible damages caused by this act. The final decision should be made with the parents and the patient. In this study, we assessed the role of various factors on the possibility of relapse of epileptic seizures after discontinuation off antiepileptic therapy. We studied a cohort of children with partial epilepsy. Discontinuation was performed from 2001-2007. The study included 93 children divided into groups according to age of diagnosis and the introduction of antiepileptic therapy, the type of seizures, etiology, neurological and psychological status, the results neuroimaging studies, family history, history of febrile seizures, antiepileptic therapy, EEG registration before discontinuation of the treatment, speed of tapering therapy. Multivariable analysis was made, binary logistic regression. Factors that showed statistical significance were: age at the diagnosis, duration of active epilepsy, neurological and psychological status, EEG registration before discontinuation of therapy, the length of the period without seizures before discontinuation of the therapy and length of tapering the therapy.It is necessary to pay attention to the factors affecting increased risk of relapse of epileptic seizures when discontinuing the antiepileptic therapy in patients with partial epilepsies. This should be discussed with parents and patients, and consensus has to be reached. Doctor and patient must be aware that the risk of recurrence of epileptic seizures is high.

Introduction: It is a well recognized fact that a significant proportion of patients operated on for lumbar disc herniation exhibit a poor outcome, regardless of the apparent technical success of the operative procedure itself. Aim: to identify a set of widely available variables that accurately predict short-term outcome after discectomy and to develop a predictive model based upon those variables. Patients and methods: Basic demographic, clinical and radiological variables were evaluated in a group of 70 patient operated on for disc herniation. Outcome was assessed using VAS and RM scales 6 months postoperatively and correlated to aforementioned variables. Results: Preoperative pain intensity and duration, age and type of disc herniation were all shown to be statistically significant predictors of short-term outcome, unlike sex, type of radiological investigation and preoperative tension sign testing results. Multivariate regression analysis including only variables previously identified as good outcome predictors revealed that the pain intensity exhibited the strongest correlation with outcome, followed by pain duration, type of disc herniation and age. Even though MR scan was more sensitive in detecting disc extrusion than CT (sensitivity of 100% versus 65%, respectively), the presence of preoperative MR scan did not influence the outcome. Conclusion: The study identified a set of widely available and easily attainable variables as fair predictors of short-term outcome after lumbar discectomy. Subsequent logistic regression resulted in a predictive model whose accuracy is to be determined in another prospective study.

Background: Many efforts have been made to find diagnostic tools that would help select children with clinical signs of acute appendicitis that would need immediate appendectomy and to find tools that would reduce the numbers of negative appendectomies. Aim: We aimed to show the association between leukocyte count, level of C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 in peripheral blood on the one side and the degree of histological findings on appendix after appendectomy on the other side in children with high clinical probability for appendicitis (Alvarado score>7). Methods: We analyzed 80 patients of both genders, younger than 15 years, with Alvarado score>7, which underwent open appendectomy with subsequent histological analysis of removed appendices. We sampled 20 consecutive cases without signs of inflammation (group I), 20 cases with pathological signs of incipient inflammation (group II), 20 cases with signs of phlegmonous inflammation (group III) and 20 cases with signs of perforated appendix (group IV). Prior to appendectomy, a peripheral blood was sampled and sent for analysis of leukocyte count and C-reactive protein and interleukine-6 level. We compared values of all 3 measured parameters according to histological findings; we also used Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis in order to evaluate diagnostic thresholds for detecting the histological signs of appendicitis. Results: The lowest values of all observed parameters were found in group of negative appendicitis while highest were observed in the group of perforated appendicitis. We have observed a significant between group differences in values of all three parameters according to the degree of histological inflammation (p<0.001). ROC analysis demonstrated that interleukine-6 had the best diagnostic performance in detecting patients with histological signs of appendicitis (AUROC=0.99; 95% CI=0.99-1.00) when compared to CRP and leukocyte count (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in diagnostic performance between CRP and leukocytes counts (p=0.35). Conclusion: Leukocyte count, CRP and interleukine-6 are very useful markers which may help in diagnostics and differentiation of phlegmonous and perforated appendicitis. In patients with high probability of appendicitis, measurement of interleukine-6 may help in better patient selection.