For better development of alternative tourism supply in mountain tourism destinations it is necessary to identify and evaluate tourism attractions that could be better valorised when creating tourism products. It is an essential part of the destination analysis to determine perception of local population and tourists when evaluating tourism attractiveness. Olympic Mountain Bjelasnica in Bosnia and Herzegovina is a representative case study of mountain tourism destination, whose recent phase of tourism development is characterized by a variety of tourism supply that allows practicing many forms of tourism with the dominance of the winter tourist season and the skiing tourism of mass character. The principal aim of the study is to determine the differences in the evaluation of tourism attractions of alternative tourism in tourism supply of Bjelasnica within and between group of local residents and tourists. Direct survey was conducted during the summer 2016 and sample included 98 local residents and 111 tourists. Results show: a) tourists evaluate most of attractions higher then local residents, b) some attractions are higher evaluated by younger and more educated local residents, c) older tourists evaluate cultural and historical heritage better, while tourists with college degree are most satisfied with tourism and recreational infrastructure considering the age, gender and level of education, and d) all clusters of attractions are rated as more attractive by tourists who stay at purpose-built mountain tourist resort Babin Do, compared to those in Bjelasnica's villages. Results can be applied as a guideline to raise local residents' awareness of tourism attractions and developing more specific tourism supply that will address not solely mass tourism, but also alternative forms of tourism.

Structural changes are crucial for sustainable industrial development. The aim of the paper is to point out that structural changes in the Serbian manufacturing industry should be accompanied by growth in production specialization and the share of hightechnology products in order to increase competitiveness. For the analysis of structural changes, a comparative method is used, to analyze production specialization, industrial sector specialization index, and for the analysis of competitiveness, the revealed comparative advantage index. The manufacturing industry is the most important sector of the Serbian economy, and, despite growth, specialization in this field is not high, which affects the lack of comparative advantages and uncompetitiveness of this sector on the EU market. The paper can be of assistance to industrial policy makers, in order to determine the best path to sustainable industrial development, using the benefits of production specialization.

The paper examines the level and changes in production specialization (diversification) characteristic of the manufacturing industry of Serbia and the member states that joined the EU in 2004 and after. The authors aim to analyze the direction of structural changes in Serbia's manufacturing industry and make comparison with the situation in the new EU member states, as well as determine whether those changes that show the same trends as GDP per capita movements are characterized by specialization growth, especially in terms of medium-high and high technology manufacturing activities. Industrial sector specialization index is used to determine the level of specialization of manufacturing industry production sectors and activities. Changes in specialization are analyzed by observing the changes in the mentioned index over a five-year period. The level of specialization of manufacturing sector is compared to the level of GDP per capita and its growth rate. In order to analyze the level of specialization of industry sectors and activities in Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia and Serbia, the comparison method was used. The results of the research indicate that the direction of structural changes in Serbian manufacturing industry does not follow the usual pattern, i.e., the lower level of GDP per capita results in a higher level of production specialization, while the lower level of specialization and smaller number of activities leads to low technology intensity of production, which is not the case with the new EU member states.