In this paper, we propose a solution to an AC state estimation problem in electric power systems using a fully distributed Gauss-Newton method. The proposed method is placed within the context of factor graphs and belief propagation algorithms and closed-form expressions for belief propagation messages exchanged along the factor graph are derived. The obtained algorithm provides the same solution as the conventional weighted least-squares state estimation. Using a simple example, we provide a step-by-step presentation of the proposed algorithm. Finally, we discuss the convergence behaviour using the IEEE 14 bus test case.

In this paper, we model an extended DC state estimation (SE) in an electric power system as a factor graph (FG) and solve it using belief propagation (BP) algorithm. The DC model comprises bus voltage angles as state variables, while the extended DC model includes bus voltage angles and bus voltage magnitudes as state variables. By applying BP to solve the SE problem in the extended DC model, we obtain a Gaussian BP scenario for which we derive closed-form expressions for BP messages exchanged along the FG. The performance of the BP algorithm is demonstrated for the IEEE 14 bus test case. Finally, the application of BP algorithm on the extended DC scenario provides significant insights into a fundamental structure of BP equations in more complex models such as the AC model - the topic we will investigate in our follow up work. As a side-goal of this paper, we aim at thorough and detailed presentation on applying BP on the SE problem in order to make the powerful BP algorithm more accessible and applicable within the power-engineering community.

This paper describes fast analytical model for computation of the switched reluctance machine's (SRM) nonlinear magnetization characteristic and torque lookup table. The flux-tube and the gage-curve methods are used to develop this fast analytical model. Presented model is used for computation of the magnetization characteristic and torque lookup table of three and four-phase SRMs. The simulation results obtained using proposed analytical model are compared to the results of magnetostatic finite-element analysis (FEA) for a three-phase 12/8 SRM. Experimental verification of the analytical model is also presented for the same 12/8 SRM prototype.