The best maintenance therapy after a steroid-responsive acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) episode remains poorly studied and is not addressed in current guidelines. We aimed to compare the impact of different treatment strategies following hospitalization for steroid-responsive ASUC. Multicentric, multinational, retrospective cohort study including patients hospitalized with ASUC, between 2010-2021, who responded to intravenous steroids (Oxford Criteria). Patients were categorized according to treatment instituted after discharge - 5ASA, immunomodulators (IMM) and advanced therapy (AT). AT was considered as the reference for comparison. Our primary outcome was a composite of time until disease progression (need for steroids, need for therapy change, new hospitalization or colectomy); secondary outcomes were each event analyzed separately. Survival analysis and multivariate cox regression were performed. 271 steroid-responsive patients from 19 countries were included; median-age at diagnosis was 33 (IQR 25-48) years, 49% were male, 49% had extensive colitis at diagnosis; median disease duration was 26 (IQR 3.0-92.3) months. Following hospitalization for steroid responsive ASUC, 34% of patients received 5-ASA as a maintenance therapy, 23% IMM and 43% AT. During a median follow up of 59 months (IQR 38-92), 68% had disease progression: new course of steroids was needed in 40%, therapy change in 54%, new hospitalization in 33% and colectomy in 10%. In univariate analysis, patients treated with 5-ASA had a trend towards earlier disease progression, compared to AT (HR 1.37, CI 95% 0.99-1.91, p=0.06), earlier need for steroids (HR 1.70, CI 95% 1.11-2.59, p=0.014) and therapy change (HR 1.68, CI 95% 1.15-2.43, p=0.007). In multivariate analysis, adjusting for age and disease extension at diagnosis, disease duration, use of AT prior to ASUC hospitalization, and period of hospitalization (2010-2015 vs 2016-2021), patients treated with 5-ASA had a higher risk of disease progression compared to both IMM (HR 1.50, CI 95% 1.02-2.21, p=0.041) and AT (HR 1.86, CI 95% 1.26-2.74, p=0.002) – Figure 1. No differences were seen between IMM and AT in uni- and multivariate analysis. Shorter disease duration (HR 0.99, CI 95% 0.99-0.99, p=0.007), and prior use of AT (HR 1.67, CI 95% 1.13-2.47, p=0.010) were also associated with higher risk of disease progression – Table 1. After an episode of steroid-responsive ASUC, shorter disease duration and prior use of advanced therapy were risk factors for disease progression. Approximately 1/3 of patients was treated with 5ASA alone. This strategy was also associated with a higher risk of poor outcomes and should be avoided.

AIM To evaluate the clinical impact of corticosteroids (CS) overuse in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Excessive use of CS could delay more efficacious treatment and may indicate poor quality of care. METHOD This is a two-phase study that used Steroid Assessment Tool (SAT) to measure corticosteroid exposure in IBD patients. In the first phase, data from 211 consecutive ambulatory patients with IBD (91 with ulcerative colitis, 115 with Crohn's disease, and five with unclassified inflammatory bowel disease) were analysed by SAT. In the second phase, one year after data entry, clinical outcome of patients with corticosteroids overuse was analysed. RESULTS Of the 211 IBD patients, 132 (62%) were not on corticosteroids, 45 (22%) were corticosteroid-dependent, and 34 (16%) used corticosteroids appropriately, according to the European Crohn's and Colitis Organization guidelines. In the group of patients with ulcerative colitis, 57 (63%) were not on corticosteroids, 18 (20%) were corticosteroid-dependent, and 16 (16%) used corticosteroids appropriately; in the group of patients with Crohn's disease 70 (61%), 27 (23%) and 18 (16%), respectively. Overall, 24 (out of 45; 53%) patients with IBD could avoid the overuse of corticosteroids if they had a timely change of the treatment, surgery, or entered a clinical trial. CONCLUSION An excessive corticosteroid use can be recognized on time using the SAT. We have proven that excessive corticosteroid use could be avoided in almost half of cases and thus the overuse of CS may indicate poor quality of care in those patients.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), necessitates effective management strategies. This study aims to evaluate the real-world efficacy of vedolizumab, a newer biological therapy, in treating IBD in Bosnia and Herzegovina. A retrospective observational study was conducted across six medical centers, involving 139 IBD patients, 76 with UC and 63 with CD. Patients were assessed for clinical remission and other outcomes at the 26-week mark post vedolizumab treatment initiation. At 26 weeks, clinical remission was achieved in 82.9% of UC patients and 85.7% of CD patients. Mucosal healing was observed in 38.1% of CD patients. The efficacy of vedolizumab did not significantly differ based on prior anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) exposure. Notably, the clinical scoring tools for predicting vedolizumab response showed limited applicability in this cohort. Vedolizumab demonstrated high efficacy in treating both UC and CD in real-world settings in Bosnia and Herzegovina, underscoring its potential as a significant therapeutic option in IBD management.

Introduction: Thyroid dysfunction (TD) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are the two most common chronic endocrine disorders with variable prevalence among different populations. Both insulin and thyroid hormones are affected by autoimmune pathology and they do affect cellular metabolism, being a part of the metabolic syndrome. However, the correlations between T2DM and TD have not yet been sufficiently defined, followed by ambivalent results from previous studies.Objectives: The study was conducted to compare the metabolic parameters of patients with T2DM with and those without AITD so as to determine the existence of a correlation between these and hormonal parameters (TSH, FT4).Design and methods: This are documented observational case-control study that included 31 subjects with T2DM and AITD and 25 with T2DM without AITD. Sessions were conducted at the Clinic for Internal Medicine of the University Clinical Center in Tuzla. Individual metabolic parameters were analyzed, and in a broad evaluation, the values of hormonal and immune parameters were monitored and documented.Results: There were no differences in age, gender and BMI of the examined groups. There was a statistically significant difference between the values related to OS, SKT, DKT, PGN, 2h ppPG, and HbA1c. A statistically significant correlation was found between TSH and females, FT4 and BMI (rS = 0.375 pvalue = 0.045) as wellas a correlation between TSH and HbA1c (rS = 0.313 pvalue = 0.019) and TSH and 2x ppPG (rS = 0.281, pvalue = 0.036).Conclusion: The expression of metabolic control parameters is strongest in the group of patients with diabetes and AITD. Their identification as a risk factor and the detection of their subclinical signs are extremely important for the early implementation of preventive and therapeutic strategies, which could change the course of diabetic complications and significantly improve prognosis of diabetes.