A brief review on wearable ECG devices and processing techniques for fall risk assessment, prevention and detection

As a consequence of the progress of the modern mobile medicine, wearable technologies, especially ECG wearables tend to become indispensable part of peoples' lives. As applications and devices for tracking cardiac electrical activity are rapidly entering the market, it is important to compare individual ECG wearable devices. This review takes a systematic approach on the analysis of wearable ECG devices. It provides a detailed introduction on the updated methods, to create a comparison between individual features of devices, and to evaluate techniques for fall risk assessment, diagnosis, and prevention. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) instructions were used as a report standard. In an effort to collect the appropriate data, various databases were queried together with specific subject-oriented keywords. This was combined with different inclusion and exclusion criteria to find the relevant data. To further improve the data gathering and reduce bias, a Zotero tool was used. The results of this paper show the comparison of the different devices and their features. All findings can be observed in the table and in words. As information for the QardioCore are scarce, all six authors consolidated on the VitalCore being the most accurate ECG wearable device, as its sensitivity and specificity are the highest. Recent advances in wearable ECG devices allow for more trouble free out of clinic fall risk assessment, detection and prevention. As people tend to prefer the comfort of their home over doctors, such progress will assure the everyday emerging of new wearables.