Psychological interventions represent a core component of contemporary interdisciplinary chronic pain treatment, yet treatment initiation following referral to pain psychology services remains consistently low. Empirical studies across behavioral health and pain medicine demonstrate that referral alone is insufficient to ensure patient engagement with psychological care. This gap between referral and treatment initiation represents a major implementation barrier limiting the impact of evidence-based psychological pain interventions. The present article synthesizes contemporary literature on behavioral health treatment initiation and chronic pain psychology to propose a structured engagement framework designed to improve initiation rates following referral. Using a targeted narrative review methodology, empirical literature published between 2021 and 2025 was examined to identify key determinants of treatment initiation across pain medicine and integrated behavioral health settings. Findings indicate that treatment initiation is best conceptualized as a multistep process involving referral communication, structural and attitudinal barriers, patient readiness, psychoeducation, and system-level facilitation. Evidence from collaborative care models suggests that active engagement strategies embedded within medical workflows can substantially improve treatment initiation rates compared with passive referral approaches. The proposed Active Engagement Model of Pain Psychology Referral integrates individual-level and system-level interventions designed to address common barriers to treatment initiation. Improving initiation requires a shift from passive referral models toward proactive engagement strategies embedded within interdisciplinary pain care. Implementing structured engagement approaches may substantially improve access to evidence-based psychological interventions for chronic pain.

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE This article reviews the latest literature regarding chronic pain epidemiology and describes pain-specific psychological factors associated with the development and maintenance of chronic pain, mental health conditions that co-occur with chronic pain, and advances in the psychobehavioral treatment of chronic pain, including established treatments (ie, cognitive behavioral therapy [CBT], acceptance and commitment therapy, and mindfulness-based stress reduction) and emerging treatments (ie, pain reprocessing therapy). LATEST DEVELOPMENTS In addition to CBT and acceptance and commitment therapy for pain, numerous other psychological treatment modalities have been integrated into chronic pain management, including mindfulness-based stress reduction, mindfulness meditation, chronic pain self-management, relaxation response, pain neuroscience education, biofeedback, hypnosis, and, more recently, integrative psychological treatment for centralized pain. This article gives an overview of these methods and contextualizes their use within the standard psychological treatment of chronic pain. ESSENTIAL POINTS Guided by the biopsychosocial treatment model, pain psychologists use numerous evidence-based psychological methods to treat patients with chronic pain conditions. Familiarity with the psychological tools available for pain management will aid neurologists and their patients in navigating the psychological aspects of living with chronic pain.

STUDY OBJECTIVES Little is known about the effectiveness of bridge clinics as transitional care programs for people with opioid use disorder in emergency departments (EDs). We assessed the effect of bridge clinic referral on health services use among patients with opioid use disorder identified in the ED. METHODS We used data for individuals aged 18 years and over with active opioid use disorder and no history of medication for opioid use disorder who were administered medication for opioid use disorder while in the ED between January 2013 and August 2022. Bridge clinic referrals started in January 2021. Eligible patients after this date comprised the intervention group. The usual care group included eligible patients before bridge clinic implementation, who were a 1:1 propensity score matched to intervention patients. We estimated risk differences and 95% confidence limits for linkage to long-term care, ED use, and inpatient admission within 120 days of the index ED visit. RESULTS Our study population comprised 928 observations after matching. Patients referred to the bridge clinic had a higher risk of linkage to long-term care (risk differences=25%; 95% confidence limits: 20%, 30%), higher risk of ED use (risk differences=7.5%, 95% confidence limits: 1.6%, 13%), and lower risk of inpatient admission (risk differences= -1.9%, 95% confidence limits: -5.9%, 2.1%). Inpatient admission increased among patients with serious mental illness but decreased among patients without serious mental illness. CONCLUSION Our overall results suggest that bridge clinic referral increases linkage to long-term care. Nevertheless, qualitatively different effects on inpatient admission between patients with and without serious mental illness warrant consideration of unmet needs among patients with serious mental illness.

As the number of older adults in low- and middle- income (LMIC) countries is expected to grow substantially over the next several decades, it is important to develop programs for the prevention of major depression in later life. These programs should be flexible enough to be adjusted to the needs of poorly resourced LMICs. The current report provides an overview of a “depression in later life” (DIL) study in Goa, India, as a promising and effective mental health prevention program, with the potential for implementation in other LMICs. DIL study uses unspecialized physicians and lay health counselors (LHCs) to deliver both scalable psychological intervention and low-intensity intervention, consistent with Institute of Medicine’s (IOM, 1994) indicated prevention approach. DIL intervention led to reduced incidence of Major Depressive Disorder in DIL-randomized participants and as such it is important in meeting the 2016-2030 United Nations Sustainable Development Goal of “Ensuring healthy lives and promoting the well-being for all at all ages."

Background: Women bear a heavier burden of the consequences related to prescription opioid use compared to their male counterparts; however, there has been little attention in the literature regarding prescription opioid use among women. We aimed to examine risk factors for prescription opioid use among women. Methods: Demographics, health status, and substance use data, including prescription opioid use, were collected through a community engagement program, HealthStreet, during a health needs assessment. Women older than 18 years were classified by opioid use: past 30-day, lifetime, but not past 30-day, or no lifetime prescription opioid use. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were calculated, and multinomial logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs; confidence interval [CI]). Results: Among 5,549 women assessed, 15% reported past 30-day use and 41% reported lifetime use of prescription opioids. While prescription sedative use was the strongest risk factor for past 30-day use among younger women (aOR = 4.84; 95% CI, 3.59–6.51), past 6-month doctor visits was the strongest risk factor for past 30-day use among older women (aOR = 4.15; 95% CI, 2.62–6.60). Conclusions: We found higher rates of prescription opioid use in this community sample of women compared to national rates. Risk factors for recent prescription opioid use (past 30-day use) differed among older and younger women. Clinicians should be more vigilant about prescribing opioids as the medical profile for women may change through age, especially the co-prescribing of opioids and sedatives.

In the period between April 6, 1992 and December 14, 1995, an estimated 102,622 people were found to have died due to war-related causes in armed conflicts in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Of those killed in the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina it is estimated that 54% were civilians. The war profoundly affected the civilian population, which was subjected to mass killings, the systemic use of rape and sexual violence, and the physical and psychological torture inside concentration camps. This case study paper has four aims. First, it highlights the complexity and severity of the traumatic psychological effects of the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina on its citizens, including the effects of the war on the generation born during or shortly after the war. Second, the paper proposes a heuristic in the form of a broader theoretical approach; an ecological analysis of human development (Bronfenbrenner, 1989). This approach aims to provide a framework for research and the development of intervention strategies for the adolescent children of adult war survivors who have been affected by war-related trauma. Third, the paper presents a case vignette of an adolescent to demonstrate the application of the ecological framework to clinical practice with adolescents. Finally, we explore how the current cultural, political, and societal realities in Bosnia and Herzegovina affect the population in general and the children of war survivors in particular. The transition from a state of war to peace is a long and continuous process with residual effects of violent conflicts permeating the broader society and its inhabitants, even after the war’s official end over 23 years ago. The authors argue that roles of psychologists and other mental health providers should expand beyond traditional focus on intrapsychic problems. Rather, effective treatment strategies should also include recognition of and attenuation of the larger systemic stressors that patients experience on daily basis. This could be accomplished through collaboration among psychologists and patients, patients’ families, teachers, and community members, all of whom directly or indirectly affect patients’ treatment outcomes.