Abstract Adrenocortical nodular hyperplasia and gastrointestinal stromal tumors are rare conditions, and their simultaneous occurrence in a single patient poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Here, we present the case of a 39-year-old female patient who underwent surgical resection for concurrent adrenocortical nodular hyperplasia and GIST on the posterior part of the gastric fundus. The patient presented with symptoms of hyperaldosteronism and malignant hypertension, leading to the discovery of these two distinct tumors. Preoperative evaluation revealed normal laboratory findings and hormone levels, except for hyperaldosteronism and hypertension. The surgical intervention included left suprarenal gland removal and wedge resection of the gastric tumor. The patient experienced a successful outcome without intraoperative complications and remained normotensive during follow-up visits, with sustaining hormonal balance. This case underscores the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration and tailored surgical planning in managing complex neoplastic conditions.

Background Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a condition with various etiological factors, marked by the sudden onset of inflammation in the pancreatic tissue. Predicting the severity and potential mortality of AP involves analyzing clinical data alongside laboratory tests and imaging. Among several grading methods with strong predictive capabilities for illness severity and mortality, the Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP) score is notable. This study aims to explore the potential role of laboratory markers, specifically red cell distribution width (RDW), RDW/platelet (PLT) ratio, and mean platelet volume (MPV), in predicting disease severity, with patients being stratified according to the BISAP scoring system. Materials and methods This research included 161 patients hospitalized at Cantonal Hospital Zenica in Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina, with a diagnosis of AP. The BISAP score was determined based on laboratory and radiological analyses. This score was used to evaluate potential correlations between laboratory findings such as RDW, RDW/PLT ratio, and MPV. Results The age range was significantly higher in patients with BISAP scores ≥3 (68 years, 64-76) compared to those with BISAP scores <3 (59.5 years, 42.75-69) (p = 0.000). RDW values were also significantly higher in patients with BISAP scores ≥3 (15.6%, 14-16.9) compared to those with BISAP scores <3 (13.5%, 13-14.1) (p = 0.000). Hospital stay duration was significantly longer for patients with BISAP scores ≥3 (9 days, 6-11) compared to those with BISAP scores <3 (5 days, 5-7) (p = 0.000). Additionally, the RDW/PLT ratio was significantly lower in patients with BISAP scores <3 (0.063 ± 0.02) compared to those with BISAP scores ≥3 (0.09 ± 0.059) (p = 0.012). Conclusion Our results indicate a significant difference in RDW/PLT ratios between patient severity groups based on BISAP scores (scores <3 vs. ≥3). This suggests that the RDW/PLT ratio may serve as a useful predictor for assessing the severity of AP. However, further research is needed to explore the full potential of the RDW/PLT ratio in evaluating AP patients.

Background COVID-19 pandemic presented an unexpected challenge for the surgical community in general and Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) specialists in particular. This document aims to summarize recent evidence and experts’ opinion and formulate recommendations to guide the surgical community on how to best organize the recovery plan for surgical activity across different sub-specialities after the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Recommendations were developed through a Delphi process for establishment of expert consensus. Domain topics were formulated and subsequently subdivided into questions pertinent to different surgical specialities following the COVID-19 crisis. Sixty-five experts from 24 countries, representing the entire EAES board, were invited. Fifty clinicians and six engineers accepted the invitation and drafted statements based on specific key questions. Anonymous voting on the statements was performed until consensus was achieved, defined by at least 70% agreement. Results A total of 92 consensus statements were formulated with regard to safe resumption of surgery across eight domains, addressing general surgery, upper GI, lower GI, bariatrics, endocrine, HPB, abdominal wall and technology/research. The statements addressed elective and emergency services across all subspecialties with specific attention to the role of MIS during the recovery plan. Eighty-four of the statements were approved during the first round of Delphi voting (91.3%) and another 8 during the following round after substantial modification, resulting in a 100% consensus. Conclusion The recommendations formulated by the EAES board establish a framework for resumption of surgery following COVID-19 pandemic with particular focus on the role of MIS across surgical specialities. The statements have the potential for wide application in the clinical setting, education activities and research work across different healthcare systems.

Once coined the neglected stepchild of global health, surgical care has become an integral part of healthcare.1 Five billion people worldwide lack access to safe, timely, and affordable surgery, obstetrics, and anesthesia, causing over 18 million preventable deaths each year.2 To systematically address infrastructural and workforce shortages, and increase the accessibility of safe surgical care, National Surgical, Obstetric, and Anesthesia Plans (NSOAPs) are being developed around the world.3 As strategic plans embedded within countries' national health plans, NSOAPs allow for comprehensive health system strengthening across workforce, infrastructure, service delivery, financing, information management, and governance.4