Background: Compression of the ulnar nerve at the level of Guyon’s canal is a very rare compressive neuropathy. Due to the vast range of symptoms that can manifest depending on the degree of ulnar nerve compression, the clinical picture is not consistent. Objective: The aim of the study is to outline the diagnostic techniques and therapeutic options. Case report: We reported a case of ganglion cyst-induced compression of the ulnar nerve in Guyon’s canal. A 45-year-old female patient underwent surgical ulnar nerve release in Guyon’s canal at the Clinic for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Discussion: After a thorough medical history and physical examination, the diagnosis of the syndrome is made, and ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) testing are used to determine the origin of the neuropathy. A ganglion cyst was identified pathohistological one month following the surgical excision of the soft tissue tumor. In order to hasten the patient’s nerve recovery, physical therapy was recommended, and the patient was monitored for the following two years. After two years of treatment, the patient has made a very good recovery of the functionally damaged hand, as determined by a modified Bishop scoring method for evaluating functional ulnar nerve recovery. Conclusion: In virtually all cases, early surgical intervention can lead to an outstanding functional recovery. If the symptoms are more severe and continue or get worse for more than three months, early surgical intervention is the gold standard for treating Guyon’s canal syndrome. If soft tissue formations are compressing the ulnar nerve in Guyon’s canal, MRI is thought to be the gold standard for diagnosis.

Background: Coronary New blood in the vascular bed after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) may represent a turning point between ischemia and normal tissue nutrition. Its quantification can help to better understand coronary artery hemodynamics after revascularization. Objective: Quantification of coronary sinus blood flow changes over time after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) using Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE). Methods: Prospective basic research, with repeated measurements on hospital sample of 61 patients whom CABG was conducted. We performed TTE recordings to measure CS flow before and two times after CABG (1 and 6 postoperative day). We measure CS diameter, Velocity Time Integral (VTI) and systemic hemodynamic data. Data needed for LV mass calculation were recorded once. During statistical analysis we define: α = 0,01, β = 0,01 (power = 1-β β= 0,99), Sample size = 60, Effect size= 0,68. We used ANOVA for Repeated Measures as main statistical test in SPSS. Results: Preoperatively we found low overall CS flow of 181 ±72 ml/min (0,68 ±0,30 ml/gram-LV/min). After surgery there was constant increase of CS flow from 276 ±79 ml/min (1,13 ±0,35 ml/gram-LV/min) first postoperative day, to 355 (±99) ml/min (1,30 ±0,46 ml/gram-LV/min) sixth postoperative day. Discussion: Amount of new blood was statistically significant after CABG with P<0,001. Same result was found after classifying patients per number of graft received, with the highest amount of new blood after four bypasses. Amount of new blood was not different if patient gets two or three bypasses. Conclusion: There was significantly new amount of blood in coronary bed after CABG, with constant increase over first 6 days.

Background: Sternotomy is a classical surgical procedure for approaching the heart and mediastinum. Sternotomy wound infections can be superficial or deep. Objective: The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the results of two treatments for deep sternal wound infection (DSWI), closed treatment (debridement, refixation and retrosternal irrigation) and open treatment (debridement, VAC therapy and then pectoral flap). Methods: Retrospective analysis of two methods of treatment of DSWI in the period of six years. The first group (G1): surgical debridement, sternum fixation with, if necessary, retrosternal irrigation. The second group (G2): surgical debridement, open sternum with VAC therapy and subsequent pectoral flap with sternum refixation if necessary. Sternotomy wound infection will be classified according to the depth of the affected areas and the time of infection. Risk factors, outcome, local findings, number of revisions, number of hospital treatment days, types of isolates, etiology of sternotomy, time from onset of sternal instability to first surgical treatment will be observed.: Results: The number of patients with DSWI was 16, which represents 1% of all sternotomy in the observed period. Mortality in the DSWI group was 35%. Surgical myocardial revascularization was initially performed in 73% of patients with DSWI. Two risk factors for DSWI were in 32% of patients and 25% had diabetes mellitus. The average time for DSWI development in G1 was 10 days (min 0, max 30) and in G2 was 20 days (min 12, max 30). Number of revisions in G1 (min 1, max 2), G2 (min 1, max 3). Average number of hospital days were in G1 23.50 days (SD 13.15), and in G2 38.17 days (SD 28.65). The sternum was osteomyelitic and fragmented in 20% of patients. More than one revision occurred in 40% of patients. The main initial isolate was Enterococcus faecalis in 27% of all DSWI (dominantly in G1 2/3 of all): Conclusion: We found that there is no statistically significant difference in observed treatments, and that each treatment has its own indications. We suggested that studies with a larger sample are needed for a definite opinion on this issue.

Introduction: Breast augmentation is one of the most frequently performed aesthetic surgical procedures in the world. The most important preoperative decisions which influence the final appearance of the augmented breast are the breast implant pocket choice and selection of the most appropriate implant. Described pocket locations are subglandular, subfascial, partially retropectoral, totally submuscular and dual plane. Aim: We have introduced a new method of pocket forming for implant placement, which is combination of Tebbett’s dual-plane 2 or 3 and Graf’s subfascial. We named it as dual plane subfascial. Methods: Between January 2016 and April 2018, total of 27 patients were operated using dual plane subfascial breast augmentation. The pinch test in the medial pole less than 2,0 cm and in upper pole less than 2,5 cm are indications for this technique. In our modification, in primary cases a dissected flap in front of muscle is fasciocutaneous (not cutaneous as in Tebbett’s technique). It will be finally located caudally of pectoral muscle and in front of the lower pole of implant. Fasciocutaneous flap in primary cases and two independent levels of soft tissue coverage (fascial and cutaneous) in secondary cases (subglandular to dual plane subfascial conversion) in front of the lower pole of implants provide better coverage than cutaneous flap alone. Results: Hematoma and infection did not occur in any patient in our study. A capsular contracture grade I/II without the need for reoperation occurred in two patients. In one patient with secondary augmentation minimal bottoming out was noticed (before reoperation patient had significant bottoming out deformity). Minimal palpability of implants is recorded in three patients. Conclusion: Dual plane subfascial is a good option in primary breast augmentation with a well set indication especially in the breasts with the upper pinch test less than 25 mm and medial pinch test less than 20 mm. The idea can be followed even in secondary breast augmentation (subglandular to dual plane subfascial conversion). There is additional soft tissue in front of the implant which led to a less implant palpability, especially in thin patient with smaller amount of subcutaneous fat.

Introduction: Timely diagnosis is a prerequisite for the successful treatment of malignant skin tumors. Late diagnosis leads a patient into a situation of losing valuable time and chance for cure. Material and methods: A prospective study was conducted from February 2006 until August 2011 which analyzed the reasons that led to establishing the diagnosis of malignant skin tumors in 220 patients. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A (102 patients), patients with diagnosed melanoma, and group B (118 patients) of patients suffering from basocellular (BCC) and planocellular cell (PCC) skin cancer. Parameters for comparison of analysis results were the reasons for coming to examination and reasons for not coming to the examination, because of which skin cancers were not diagnosed in time. Goal: To determine the factors that influences the establishment of late diagnosis and treatment of skin tumors. Results: It was confirmed that the prejudices of patients that tumors of the skin „should not be operated because it is dangerous“ is the main reason for late diagnosis. At the same time it is confirmed that the belief that it is unnecessary to operate congenital changes of the skin is the second most important reason for delayed diagnosis of malignant skin tumors.