The objective of the study was to evaluate major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after successful versus failed percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion (PCI-CTO).Limited data are available on long-term clinical follow-up in the treatment of chronic total occlusion (CTO).Between January 2009 and December 2010 PCI-CTO was attempted in 283 consecutive patients with 289 CTO lesions. Procedural success was 62.3% and clinical follow-up covered 83% (235/283) of the study population with a median follow-up of 66 months (range, 59-74).The total incidence of MACE was 57/235 (24.3%), and was significantly higher in the procedural failure group than in the procedural success group (33/87 (37.9%) versus 24/148 (16.2%), P < 0.001). All-cause mortality was significantly lower in patients with successful PCI-CTO compared to failed PCI-CTO (10.8% versus 20.7%, P < 0.05). Also, the rate of cardiovascular death in the procedural failure group (14.9%) was slightly higher than that in the procedural success group (7.4%, P = 0.066). The rate of TVR was statistically higher in the procedural failure group (P < 0.009). Propensity score-adjusted Cox regression showed that procedural success remained a significant predictor of MACE (adjusted HR 0.402; 95% CI 0.196-0.824; P = 0.013).Our study emphasizes the importance of CTO recanalization in improving long-term outcome including all-cause mortality with a borderline effect on cardiovascular mortality.

Background Rehospitalizations (RHs) after ST‐elevation myocardial infarction carry a high economic burden and may deteriorate quality of life. Characterizing patients at higher risk may allow the design of preventive measures. We studied the frequency, reasons, and predictors for unplanned cardiac and noncardiac RHs in ST‐elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods and Results In this post‐hoc analysis of the COMFORTABLE AMI (Comparison of Biolimus Eluted From an Erodible Stent Coating With Bare Metal Stents in Acute ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction; NCT00962416) trial including 1137 patients, unplanned cardiac and noncardiac RHs occurred in 133 (11.7%) and in 79 patients (6.9%), respectively, at 1 year. The most frequent reasons for unplanned cardiac RHs were recurrent chest pain without evidence of ischemia (20.4%), recurrent chest pain with ischemia and coronary intervention (16.9%), and ischemic events (16.9%). Unplanned noncardiac RHs occurred most frequently attributed to bleeding (24.5%), infections (14.3%), and cancer (9.1%). On multivariate analysis, left ventricular ejection fraction (22% increase in the rate of RHs per 10% decrease; P=0.03) and angiographic myocardial infarction Syntax score (34% increase per 10‐point increase; P=0.01) were independent predictors of unplanned cardiac RHs. Age emerged as the only independent predictor of unplanned noncardiac RHs. Regional differences for unplanned cardiac RHs were observed. Conclusions Among ST‐elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the setting of a randomized, clinical trial, unplanned cardiac RHs occurred in 12% with recurrent chest pain being the foremost reason. Unplanned noncardiac RHs occurred in 7% with bleeding as the leading cause. Left ventricular ejection fraction and Syntax score were independent predictors of unplanned cardiac RHs and identified patient subgroups in need for improved secondary prevention. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00962416.