OBJECTIVE This paper describes our experience and outcomes from 54 cases presented to the (Molecular tumor board) MTB. METHODS 54 Cases presented between July 2017 and April 2018 were included in this analysis. These patients had different types of cancers that had either failed standard therapy or were expected to fail and physicians were looking for future options for anticipated progression. Patients who had obvious mutations and were candidates for Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry or Molecular Analysis for Treatment Choice clinical trials were not included. Oncologists presented the cases virtually and Foundation Medicine scientific and clinical team discussed the molecular pathways to find targeted options or trials. Tumor board attendees included oncologists, nurses, pharmacists, mid-level providers, residents and staff of the Cancer Center. RESULTS Amongst the 54 cases presented 81% had one or more potentially actionable alteration. 12 (22%) patients received genomically matched therapy as per MTB recommendations. Additional 13 (24%) patients have options available when they progress. Out of 12 patients who got treatment six are alive at the time of this analysis. Genomically matched therapy or Clinical Trials option were offered to the 46% of patients based on the MTB discussion. CONCLUSION More widespread use of molecular diagnostics, better physician education and multidisciplinary collaboration between the staff involved in diagnosis and treatment, as well as third party payers are necessary for consensus on treatment and care of oncology patients.

TPS3155 Background: Genomic signatures are revolutionizing the definition, identification, and treatment of breast cancer. To precisely stratify breast cancers into actionable subgroups, full genome expression data and matching clinical data must be aggregated into a large data set. Such a data set will accelerate research and discovery, especially for smaller patient subsets who are not as widely represented within the current body of literature. Methods: FLEX is a multicenter, prospective, population-based, observational trial for patients with Stage I, II, and III breast cancer. All patients with stage I to III breast cancer who receive MammaPrint, with or without BluePrint on a primary breast tumor are eligible for enrollment. The study’s primary aim is to create a large scale, population-based registry of full genome expression data matched with clinical data to investigate new gene associations with prognostic and/or predictive value. Secondary objectives include utilizing the shared study infrastructure to examine and generate hypotheses for targeted subset analyses and/or trials based on full genome expression data. The design of FLEX allows targeted sub-studies and sub-analyses to be added as appendices after the initial baseline study is opened. Patients enrolled in the initial study are also eligible for inclusion in sub-studies where they meet all criteria and additional consent is not required. Additional clinical data will be collected as specified in the appendix protocols. The FLEX collaborative platform allows participating investigators the opportunity to author their own sub-study protocols, as approved by the FLEX Steering Committee of their peers. 13 sub-studies have already been identified and are under development. Eligibility: The study will enroll a minimum of 10000 patients aged ≥18 years with histologically proven invasive stage I-III breast cancer who signed informed consent. Enrollment began April 2017 and 1506 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT03053193.

Frits van Rhee,1 Peter Voorhees,2 Angela Dispenzieri,3 Alexander Fosså,4 Gordan Srkalovic,5 Makoto Ide,6 Nikhil Munshi,7 Stephen Schey,8 Matthew Streetly,8 Sheila K. Pierson,9 Helen L. Partridge,9 Sudipto Mukherjee,10 Dustin Shilling,9 Katie Stone,1 Amy Greenway,1 Jason Ruth,11 Mary Jo Lechowicz,12 Shanmuganathan Chandrakasan,13 Raj Jayanthan,14 Elaine S. Jaffe,15 Heather Leitch,16 Naveen Pemmaraju,17 Amy Chadburn,18 Megan S. Lim,19 Kojo S. Elenitoba-Johnson,19 Vera Krymskaya,20 Aaron Goodman,21 Christian Hoffmann,22,23 Pier Luigi Zinzani,24 Simone Ferrero,25 Louis Terriou,26 Yasuharu Sato,27 David Simpson,28 Raymond Wong,29 Jean-Francois Rossi,30 Sunita Nasta,31 Kazuyuki Yoshizaki,32 Razelle Kurzrock,33 Thomas S. Uldrick,34 Corey Casper,35 Eric Oksenhendler,36 and David C. Fajgenbaum9

Castleman disease (CD) describes a group of heterogeneous hematologic disorders with characteristic histopathological features. CD can present with unicentric or multicentric (MCD) regions of lymph node enlargement. Some cases of MCD are caused by human herpesvirus-8 (HHV-8), whereas others are HHV-8-negative/idiopathic (iMCD). Treatment of iMCD is challenging, and outcomes can be poor because no uniform treatment guidelines exist, few systematic studies have been conducted, and no agreed upon response criteria have been described. The purpose of this paper is to establish consensus, evidence-based treatment guidelines based on the severity of iMCD to improve outcomes. An international Working Group of 42 experts from 10 countries was convened by the Castleman Disease Collaborative Network to establish consensus guidelines for the management of iMCD based on published literature, review of treatment effectiveness for 344 cases, and expert opinion. The anti-interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody siltuximab (or tocilizumab, if siltuximab is not available) with or without corticosteroids is the preferred first-line therapy for iMCD. In the most severe cases, adjuvant combination chemotherapy is recommended. Additional agents are recommended, tailored by disease severity, as second- and third-line therapies for treatment failures. Response criteria were formulated to facilitate the evaluation of treatment failure or success. These guidelines should help treating physicians to stratify patients based on disease severity in order to select the best available therapeutic option. An international registry for patients with CD (ACCELERATE, #NCT02817997) was established in October 2016 to collect patient outcomes to increase the evidence base for selection of therapies in the future.

Objective of the paper is to present lung cancer as preventable disease based on epidemiological, molecular and genomic data. Lung cancer is the most deadly malignancy around the world, both in male and female population. Vast majority of lung cancers (close to 90%) are directly caused by cigarette smoking, and thus present one of the most preventable deadly disease in humanity. Analysis of history of cigarette consumption and rise of lung cancer as world epidemics. Review of efforts to fight tobacco epidemics and how it influences incidence and prevalence of the lung cancer. Investigation of the effects of cigarette smoking on health and economic status of Bosnia and Hercegovina. Tobacco epidemics and lung cancer can be prevented. Goal is to exterminate cigarette smoking. That can be achieved only concerted effort by members of family, patients themselves, physicians, researchers, non-governmental organizations, political figures and society as a whole. CONCLUSION In country like Bosnia and Herzegovina first step is to inform society about devastating effects of cigarette smoking. Best practices already exist and initial goal should be to start using them.

Background: IMPACt is a prospective, case-only study to measure the effect of MammaPrint (MP) and BluePrint (BP) on treatment decisions in breast cancer patients. Here, we report the results of the primary objective in women aged ≥18 years with histologically proven invasive stage I-II, hormone receptor (HR) positive, and HER2-negative breast cancer. Methods: The study included 369 women from 18 US institutions. The recommended treatment plan was captured before and after receiving results for MP and BP. Treatment was started after obtaining results. In addition to the effect of results on physician treatment decisions involving chemotherapy (CT) and physician confidence, the distribution of MP High Risk (HR) and Low Risk (LR) patients was also evaluated. Results: MP classified patients to 62% (n=228) LR and 38% (n=141) HR. Treatment decisions were changed for 25% (n=92) of women after receiving MP and BP results. Of the LR patients initially prescribed CT, 68% (45/66) had CT removed from their treatment recommendation. Of the HR patients who initially were not prescribed CT, 66% (42/64) had CT added. Overall, 89% (202/228) of LR patients did not receive CT, and likewise 84% (119/141) of HR patients did receive CT after receiving MP. Among those who did not change treatment (n=277), 68% of physicians reported having greater confidence in their prescribed therapy. Conclusions: The IMPACt trial shows MP generates a 25% overall treatment change in clinical practice. The highest impact is for women with LR results, where 68% are spared chemotherapy in favor of endocrine therapy alone. Additionally, 73% of physicians report having higher confidence in treatment decisions for their patient after MP. Citation Format: Soliman H, Rehmus E, Shah V, Srkalovic G, Mahtani R, Levine E, Mavromatis B, Srinivasiah J, Kassar M, Gabordi R, Yoder E, Qamar R, Audeh W, IMPACt Investigators Group I. IMPACt trial: MammaPrint and BluePrint molecular subtyping guide treatment decisions in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-13-04.

521Background: S0221 investigated weekly vs q 2 week dosing of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) and paclitaxel (P) in patients (pts) with high risk early breast cancer as previously reported (JCO 33:58-64, 2015). After enrollment of 2716 pts randomization to the two AC arms was stopped for futility and an additional 578 pts received 4 cycles of q 2 week AC and were randomized to P weekly (Pw) or P q 2 weeks (P2). We report updated results of the original trial design and the first report of the 578 pts treated with AC x 4 and Pw x 12 or P2 x 6. Methods: Between December 2003 and November 2010, 2716 pts were randomized in a 2x2 factorial design to 1) 15 weeks of weekly AC (A 24 mg/m2/week and C 60 mg/m2/day po) vs 6 cycles of q 2 week AC (A 60 mg/m2 and C 600 mg/m2) and 2) Pw (paclitaxel 80 mg/m2/week x 12) vs P2 (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 q 2 weeks x 6), with growth factor support as previously described. After study amendment 578 patients received 4 cycles of q 2 week AC followed by Pw or P2. Updated surviva...

PURPOSE Veliparib, a poly (ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitor, potentiated standard chemotherapy against small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in preclinical studies. We evaluated the combination of veliparib with cisplatin and etoposide (CE; CE+V) doublet in untreated, extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with ES-SCLC, stratified by sex and serum lactate dehydrogenase levels, were randomly assigned to receive four 3-week cycles of CE (75 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 and 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 3) along with veliparib (100 mg orally twice per day on days 1 through 7) or placebo (CE+P). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Using an overall one-sided 0.10-level log-rank test, the study had 88% power to demonstrate a 37.5% reduction in the PFS hazard rate. RESULTS A total of 128 eligible patients received treatment on protocol. The median age was 66 years, 52% of patients were men, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 for 29% of patients and 1 for 71%. The respective median PFS for the CE+V arm versus the CE+P arm was 6.1 versus 5.5 months (unstratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [one-sided P = .06]; stratified HR, 0.63 [one-sided P = .01]), favoring CE+V. The median overall survival was 10.3 versus 8.9 months (stratified HR, 0.83; 80% CI, 0.64 to 1.07; one-sided P = .17) for the CE+V and CE+P arms, respectively. The overall response rate was 71.9% versus 65.6% (two-sided P = .57) for CE+V and CE+P, respectively. There was a significant treatment-by-strata interaction in PFS: Male patients with high lactate dehydrogenase levels derived significant benefit (PFS HR, 0.34; 80% CI, 0.22 to 0.51) but there was no evidence of benefit among patients in other strata (PFS HR, 0.81; 80% CI, 0.60 to 1.09). The following grade ≥ 3 hematology toxicities were more frequent in the CE+V arm than the CE+P arm: CD4 lymphopenia (8% v 0%; P = .06) and neutropenia (49% v 32%; P = .08), but treatment delivery was comparable. CONCLUSION The addition of veliparib to frontline chemotherapy showed signal of efficacy in patients with ES-SCLC and the study met its prespecified end point.

Castleman disease (CD) describes a group of three rare and poorly understood lymphoproliferative disorders that have heterogeneous clinical symptoms and common lymph node histopathological features. Unicentric CD (UCD) involves a single region of enlarged nodes. Multicentric CD (MCD) involves multiple regions of enlarged lymph nodes, constitutional symptoms, and organ dysfunction due to a cytokine storm often including interleukin 6. MCD is further divided into Human Herpes Virus-8 (HHV-8)-associated MCD, which occurs in immunocompromised individuals, and HHV-8-negative/idiopathic MCD (iMCD). Recently, iMCD has been further sub-divided into patients with TAFRO syndrome, which involves thrombocytopenia (T), anasarca (A), fevers (F), reticulin myelofibrosis (R), organomegaly (O), and normal or only slightly elevated immunoglobulin levels, and those who do not have TAFRO syndrome. Non-TAFRO iMCD patients typically have thrombocytosis, less severe fluid accumulation, and hypergammaglobulinemia. iMCD patients with TAFRO syndrome may have a worse prognosis, but more research is needed.

Human herpesvirus-8 (HHV-8)-negative, idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD) is a rare and life-threatening disorder involving systemic inflammatory symptoms, polyclonal lymphoproliferation, cytopenias, and multiple organ system dysfunction caused by a cytokine storm often including interleukin-6. iMCD accounts for one third to one half of all cases of MCD and can occur in individuals of any age. Accurate diagnosis is challenging, because no standard diagnostic criteria or diagnostic biomarkers currently exist, and there is significant overlap with malignant, autoimmune, and infectious disorders. An international working group comprising 34 pediatric and adult pathology and clinical experts in iMCD and related disorders from 8 countries, including 2 physicians that are also iMCD patients, was convened to establish iMCD diagnostic criteria. The working group reviewed data from 244 cases, met twice, and refined criteria over 15 months (June 2015 to September 2016). The proposed consensus criteria require both Major Criteria (characteristic lymph node histopathology and multicentric lymphadenopathy), at least 2 of 11 Minor Criteria with at least 1 laboratory abnormality, and exclusion of infectious, malignant, and autoimmune disorders that can mimic iMCD. Characteristic histopathologic features may include a constellation of regressed or hyperplastic germinal centers, follicular dendritic cell prominence, hypervascularization, and polytypic plasmacytosis. Laboratory and clinical Minor Criteria include elevated C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate, anemia, thrombocytopenia or thrombocytosis, hypoalbuminemia, renal dysfunction or proteinuria, polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia, constitutional symptoms, hepatosplenomegaly, effusions or edema, eruptive cherry hemangiomatosis or violaceous papules, and lymphocytic interstitial pneumonitis. iMCD consensus diagnostic criteria will facilitate consistent diagnosis, appropriate treatment, and collaborative research.

In an attempt to produce better cytotoxic analogues, chemotherapeutic antineoplastic radicals including an alkylating nitrogen mustard derivative of D-phenylalanine (D-melphalan), reactive cyclopropane, anthraquinone deriva- tives (2-(hydroxymethyl)anthraquinone and the anticancer an- tibiotic doxorubicin), and an antimetabolite (methotrexate) were coupled to suitably modified agonists and antagonists of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH). Analogues with D-lysine6 and D-ornithine6 or Nt-(2,3-diaminopropionyl)- D-lysine and N6-(2,3-diaminopropionyl)-D-ornithine were used as carriers for one or two cytotoxic moieties. The enhanced biological activities produced by the incorporation of D amino acids into position 6 of the agonistic analogues were further increased by the attachment of hydrophobic cytotoxic groups, resulting in compounds with 10-50 times higher activity than LH-RH. Most of the monosubstituted agonistic analogues showed high affinities for the membrane receptors of human breast cancer cells, while the receptor binding affinities of peptides containing two cytotoxic side chains were lower. Antagonistic carriers (Ac-D-Nal(2)1,D-Phe(4Cl)2,D- Trp3,Arg5,D-Lys6,D-Ala10ILH-RH (where Nal(2) is 3-(2- naphthyl)alanine), (Ac-D-Nal(2)',D-Phe(4Cl)2,D-TrpArg5,- (2,3-diaminopropionyl)-D-Lys6,D-Alal')LH-RH, and their D-Pal(3)3 homologs (Pal(3) is 3-(3-pyridyl)alanine) as well as (AC-D-Nal(2) ,D-Phe(4Cl)2,D-Pal(3)3,Tyr5,Ne-(2,3-diamino-