Secondary angiosarcoma of the breast is a rare, but well-described complication of radiation therapy for primary breast carcinoma. Currently, it appears refractory to most systemic chemotherapy though rare responses to taxanes exist (1,2). Overall, patient prognosis is poor (3). A 78-year-old female underwent left breast conservation and axillary node dissection in 1999 for invasive ductal carcinoma followed by whole breast radiation therapy. Eleven years later, she noted multiple small nodules in the medial aspect of the left breast. Biopsy of the nodules revealed angiosarcoma of the breast. A metastatic follow-up showed no evidence of distant disease and a modified radical mastectomy performed. Histopathology confirmed the presence of angiosarcoma with all margins negative. The patient completed a course of postmastectomy irradiation with dose limitation by previous radiation for her original breast conserving procedure. This was administered concurrently with adjuvant chemotherapy (Taxol and Adriamycin). The patient did not tolerate the chemotherapy but finished the course of radiation therapy. Ten months later, angiosarcoma nodules recurred along the mastectomy scar. Chemotherapy with single agent carboplatinum was ineffective. Six months later, she underwent a wide resection of the skin and soft tissue of the left chest wall with multiple cutaneous nodules and positive deep margin (the pectoral muscle/ribs) was noted. In the interim, she underwent a split thickness skin graft to cover the large defect. Within 6 months, recurrent disease appeared in the graft and surrounding soft tissue. With no documented distant metastases, the patient again underwent a resection of recurrent tumors, chest wall and two ribs requiring TRAM flap coverage. A Caris profile was requested. She remained free of local recurrence for only 4 months, when multiple and rapidly growing subcutaneous nodules became evident about the chest wall and flap (Fig. 1A). The Caris gene expression assay performed earlier demonstrated a potential therapeutic benefit of sunitinib due to the upregulation of VEGFR2. Sunitinib was then

Background Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) accounts for approximately 3% of all malignancies. Despite extensive laboratory and imaging efforts, the primary site usually cannot be unequivocally confirmed, and the treatment for the most part remains empirical. Recently, identification of common cancer pathway alterations in diverse cancer lineages has offered an opportunity to provide targeted therapies for patients with CUP, irrespective of the primary site. Patients and Methods 1806 cancers of unknown primary were identified among more than 63,000 cases profiled at Caris Life Sciences. Multiplatform profiling of the tumor samples included immunohistochemistry, gene sequencing and in situ hybridization methods in an effort to identify changes in biomarkers that are predictive of drug responses. Results Biomarkers associated with a potential drug benefit were identified in 96% of cases. Biomarkers identified included those associated with potential benefit in nearly all classes of approved cancer drugs (cytotoxic, hormonal, targeted biological drugs). Additionally, biomarkers associated with a potential lack of benefit were identified in numerous cases, which could further refine the management of patients with CUP. Conclusion Comprehensive biomarker profiling of CUP may provide additional choices in treatment of patients with these difficult to treat malignancies.

We report two new cases of cystic fibroepithelioma of Pinkus together with immunohistochemical features and analyze the presence of cystic changes in a series of 16 classical fibroepitheliomas of Pinkus. Our findings show that the formation of cystic spaces is most probably caused by ischemic degeneration of stromal fenestrations, rather than by central tumor cell necrosis. This finding is supported by lack of CD34 positive blood vessels in edematous and hyalinized stromal fenestrations undergoing transformation into cystic spaces, as opposed to the uninvolved stromal fenestrations. Therefore, it is probably more accurate to refer to this process as pseudocystic stromal degeneration rather than true cyst formation. Also, two out of 16 classical Pinkus fibroepitheliomas exhibited focal pseudocystic changes in 50% and 10% of the tumor, respectively, demonstrating that this degenerative process can be found, rarely and focally, in classical cases as well.