Dear Editor, A 62-year-old female with metastatic melanoma presented with shortness of breath four days after her fourth cycle of combination checkpoint inhibitor therapy (CPI) (nivolumab and ipilimumab) having previously received 12 months of adjuvant nivolumab 14 months earlier. Subsequent investigations confirmed CPI related myocarditis. She also described new onset of symptoms consistent with Raynaud's. Her past medical history included recurrent migraines for which she took propranolol. She was admitted to hospital, and received two 500mg doses of intravenous methylprednisolone, and commenced on a reducing course or oral prednisolone (1mg/kg), lansoprazole and co-trimoxazole prophylaxis. Blood tests initially revealed a negative anti-nuclear antibody, lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies with normal complement levels and rheumatoid factor. However repeat bloods six weeks later revealed a positive ANA and a very mildly positive extractable nuclear antigen (anti-SSA52/Ro autoantibody) by rheumatology did not identify any underlying connective tissue disease and concluded that the Raynaud's was likely to be secondary to the CPI.

The clinical and immunologic implications of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic for patients with cancer receiving systemic anticancer therapy have introduced a multitude of clinical challenges and academic controversies. This review summarizes the current evidence, discussion points, and recommendations regarding the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with cancer during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, with a focus on patients with melanoma and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). More specifically, we summarize the theoretical concepts and available objective data regarding the relationships between ICIs and the antiviral immune response, along with recommended clinical approaches to the management of melanoma and RCC patient cohorts receiving ICIs throughout the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. Additional insights regarding the use of ICIs in the setting of current and upcoming COVID-19 vaccines and broader implications toward future pandemics are also discussed.

While our knowledge of the evolutionary features of primary tumors has grown exponentially over the last few years our understanding of evolution of metastases is more limited and many open questions remain, regarding the timing of metastatic dissemination, the acquisition of metastatic competence and the underpinning of the variety of metastatic phenotypes observed in the clinic from latent metastases to solitary and oligo-metastases to widespread metastases. We have leveraged unique translational protocols that allow interrogation of tumor evolution from the earliest stages of diseases to death to address some of these questions. In the context of renal cell cancers we show that the mode of evolution at the primary tumor site determines the tempo and distribution of systemic metastases; that the features that distinguish metastasis-competent clones included genome instability and aneuploidy; and that metastatic competence often emerges in the centre of the primary tumor. In the context of melanoma we observe a wide spectrum of metastatic seeding that includes organ-specific metastatic clones, monophyletic and polyphyletic seeding and polyclonal mixing at metastatic sites. We observe progressive increase in aneuploidy and occurrence of whole genome doubling as melanoma metastases progress and resist treatment suggesting this as a a mechanism of immune-evasion and treatment resistance. Citation Format: Samra Turajlic. Understanding evolution of metastatic disease in renal cancer and melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr SY02-02.

Introduction Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have changed the treatment landscape for many cancers, but also cause severe inflammatory side effects including enterocolitis. CPI-induced enterocolitis is treated empirically with corticosteroids, and infliximab (IFX) is used in corticosteroid-refractory cases. However, robust outcome data for these patients are scarce. Methods We conducted a multicenter (six cancer centers), cohort study of outcomes in patients treated with IFX for corticosteroid-refractory CPI-induced enterocolitis between 2007 and 2020. The primary outcome was corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CFCR) with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 0 for diarrhea at 12 weeks after IFX initiation. We also assessed cancer outcomes at 1 year using RECIST V1.1 criteria. Results 127 patients (73 male; median age 59 years) were treated with IFX for corticosteroid-refractory CPI-induced enterocolitis. Ninety-six (75.6%) patients had diarrhea CTCAE grade >2 and 115 (90.6%) required hospitalization for colitis. CFCR was 41.2% at 12 weeks and 50.9% at 26 weeks. In multivariable logistic regression, IFX-resistant enterocolitis was associated with rectal bleeding (OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.80; p=0.03) and absence of colonic crypt abscesses (OR 2.16; 95% CI 1.13 to 8.05; p=0.03). Cancer non-progression was significantly more common in patients with IFX-resistant enterocolitis (64.4%) as compared with patients with IFX-responsive enterocolitis (37.5%; p=0.013). Conclusion This is the largest study to date reporting outcomes of IFX therapy in patients with corticosteroid-refractory CPI-induced enterocolitis. Using predefined robust endpoints, we have demonstrated that fewer than half of patients achieved CFCR. Our data also indicate that cancer outcomes may be better in patients developing prolonged and severe inflammatory side effects of CPI therapy.

TPS9587 Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA; the tumour derived fraction of circulating free DNA in the blood) has been shown to be a biomarker of tumor burden/progression in many cancers. We recently accurately monitored treatment response and resistance in stage IV melanoma by ctDNA analysis in serial peripheral blood samples. Pre-clinical data has previously revealed that BRAF inhibition provokes a micro-environment with increased T cell infiltration, improved T cell recognition of melanoma associated antigens and reduced production of immunosuppressive cytokines that could enhance immune responses. We aimed to test the hypothesis that ctDNA could be implemented as a personalised, real-time liquid biopsy to identify when tumours are responding to targeted therapy in order optimise a switch to immunotherapy. Methods: We validated the ctDNA assays for BRAF mutation calling as a primary trial endpoint. We designed a phase II multicenter, parallel arm study across 6 UK sites, to assess primary objectives of i). Whether a ctDNA result can be turned around within 7 days and actioned in a clinically relevant timeframe ii). to assess whether a decrease in ctDNA levels of mutant BRAF by ≥80% from baseline on targeted therapy is an appropriate ‘cut off’ to instruct switching to immunotherapy. Secondary endpoints include Overall Response Rate (ORR) to immunotherapy, radiological/clinical and ctDNA determined progression free survival (PFS) on each treatment. Forty patients are planned based on inclusion criteria of stage IV or stage III unresectable cutaneous BRAF mutant melanoma, baseline ctDNA BRAF variant allele frequency (VAF) ≥1.5%, ECOG 0/1/2, no symptomatic brain metastases, no prior adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab (N+I). Prior adjuvant dabrafinib + trametinib (D+T) is allowed as long as recurrence is >6 months from completion. Patients are randomised 1:1 to either standard Arm A; investigator choice of either D+T (150mg BD +2mg OD respectively) or N+I (1 mg/kg N +3 mg/kg I q3 wkly, then N 480mg q4 wkly) first line, then switch on progression to the other treatment. In the experimental Arm B; all patients start on D+T and have BRAF ctDNA monitored q2 wkly for 4 wks then q4 wkly. When ≥80% decrease vs. baseline in ctDNA BRAF VAF occurs, patients switch to N+I. If patients subsequently progress on N+I, they will resume D+T. The study is open with 9 patients enrolled at time of submission. Clinical trial information: NCT03808441.

During cancer evolution, constituent tumor cells compete under dynamic selection pressures. Phenotypic variation can be observed as intratumor heterogeneity, which is propagated by genome instability leading to mutations, somatic copy-number alterations, and epigenomic changes. TRACERx was set up in 2014 to observe the relationship between intratumor heterogeneity and patient outcome. By integrating multiregion sequencing of primary tumors with longitudinal sampling of a prospectively recruited patient cohort, cancer evolution can be tracked from early- to late-stage disease and through therapy. Here we review some of the key features of the studies and look to the future of the field. SIGNIFICANCE: Cancers evolve and adapt to environmental challenges such as immune surveillance and treatment pressures. The TRACERx studies track cancer evolution in a clinical setting, through primary disease to recurrence. Through multiregion and longitudinal sampling, evolutionary processes have been detailed in the tumor and the immune microenvironment in non-small cell lung cancer and clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. TRACERx has revealed the potential therapeutic utility of targeting clonal neoantigens and ctDNA detection in the adjuvant setting as a minimal residual disease detection tool primed for translation into clinical trials.

We present a case of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) that occurred five days after vaccination with BTN162b2 (tozinameran), an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, in a patient with colorectal cancer on long-standing anti-PD-1 monotherapy. The CRS was evidenced by raised inflammatory markers, thrombocytopenia, elevated cytokine levels (IFN-y/IL-2R/IL-18/IL-16/IL-10), and steroid responsiveness.

Antigen recognition and T-cell mediated cytotoxicity in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) remains incompletely understood. To address this knowledge gap, we analysed 115 multiregion tumour samples collected from 15 treatment-naive patients pre- and post-nivolumab therapy, and at autopsy in three patients. We performed whole-exome sequencing, RNAseq, TCRseq, multiplex immunofluorescence and flow cytometry analyses and correlated with clinical response. We observed pre-treatment intratumoural TCR clonal expansions suggesting pre-existing immunity. Nivolumab maintained pre-treatment expanded, clustered TCR clones in responders, suggesting ongoing antigen-driven stimulation of T-cells. T-cells in responders were enriched for expanded TCF7+CD8+ T-cells and upregulated GZMK/B upon nivolumab-binding. By contrast, nivolumab promoted accumulation of new TCR clones in non-responders, replacing pre-treatment expanded clonotypes. In this dataset, mutational features did not correlate with response to nivolumab and human endogenous retrovirus expression correlated indirectly. Our data suggests that nivolumab potentiates clinical responses in ccRCC by binding pre-existing expanded CD8+ T-cells to enhance cytotoxicity.

There is a pressing need to characterise the nature, extent and duration of immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in cancer patients, to inform risk-reduction strategies and preserve cancer outcomes. CAPTURE is a prospective, longitudinal cohort study of cancer patients and healthcare workers (HCWs) integrating immune profiles and clinical annotation. We evaluated 529 blood samples and 1051 oronasopharyngeal swabs from 144 cancer patients and 73 HCWs and correlated with >200 clinical variables. In patients with solid cancers and HCWs, S1-reactive and neutralising antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 were detectable five months post-infection. In these participants, SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses were detected. CD4+ T-cell response correlated with S1 antibody levels. Patients with haematological malignancies had impaired but partially compensated immune responses, depending on malignancy and therapy. Overall, cancer stage, disease status, and therapies did not correlate with immune responses. These findings have implications for understanding individual risks and potential effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in this population. Citation Format: Lewis Au, Annika Fendler, Laura Amanda Boos, Fiona Byrnes, Scott Shepherd, Emma Nicholson, Scaheen Kumar, Nadia Yousaf, Katalin Wilkinson, Anthony Swerdlow, Ruth Harvey, George Kassiotis, Robert Wilkinson, James Larkin, Samra Turajlic. Adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in cancer patients: The CAPTURE study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Meeting: COVID-19 and Cancer; 2021 Feb 3-5. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2021;27(6_Suppl):Abstract nr S03-02.