Journal of Society for development in new net environment in B&H 1793 Jaw cysts of various dimensions are a common pathology encountered in oral surgery. The therapeutic approach to these pathological outgrowths depends on their dimensions and locality. It is a challenging task for any oral surgeon to manage a cyst, be it mandibular or maxillary, by applying a primary closing method. of this paper is to present a case study involving two patients and our therapeutic approach to resolving a problem of mandibular and maxillary cyst, respectively. The surgical technique we applied in these patients and the preoperative and postoperative problems encountered in both cases are also reported in the present study. By comparing the orthopantomographic pictures taken prior to surgical intervention with those taken several months following the surgical intervention, we could observe a good regeneration of the bone. Both patients were reported to be feeling well. jaw cysts, therapy, complications

It is a well-known scientific fact that only a small percentage of infiltration of inferior alveolar nerve is clinically proven to be efficient. The objective of this study was to determine the anesthetic efficacy of supplemental intraosseous injection, used after the insufficient classical mandibular block that didn't provide deep pulp anesthesia of mandibular molar planed for extraction. The experimental teeth consisted of 98 mandibular molars with clinical indication for extraction. Based on the history of disease, we indicated the extraction of the tooth. After that each tooth was tested with a electric pulp tester P1. We tested the pulp vitality and precisely determined the level of vitality. After that, each patient received classical mandibular block, and the pulp vitality was tested again. If the pulp tester indicated negative vitality for the certain mandibular molar, and the patient didn't complain about pain or discomfort during the extraction, the molar was extracted and the result was added to anesthetic success rate for the classical mandibular block. If, five minutes after receiving the mandibular block, the pulp tester indicated positive vitality (parameters of vitality) or the patient complained about pain or discomfort (parameters of pain and discomfort), we used the Stabident intraosseous anesthesia system. Three minutes after the application of supplemental intraosseous injection the molar was tested with the pulp tester again. The anesthetic solution used in both anesthetic techniques is lidocaine with 1:100.000 epinephrine. The results of this study indicate that the anesthetic efficacy of the mandibular block is 74.5%, and that supplemental intraosseous anesthesia, applied after the insufficient mandibular block, provides pulpal anesthesia in 94.9% of mandibular molars. The difference between anesthetic efficacy of the classical mandibular block and anesthetic efficacy of the supplemental intraosseous anesthesia, applied after the insufficient mandibular block, is obvious.

In their practice every dentist is brought into a situation to treat patients with grossly impaired kidney function. Kidney diseases, whether acute or acquired, imply a number of body dysfunctions such as prolonged bleeding, high blood pressure, infection tendency etc. which, in turn, pose a threat involving serious complications in cases of dental interventions in these patients. The aim of this article is to provide a review of current dental practice in patients with kidney disease. This implies dental intervention and preparations of patients with chronic renal disease, nephritic syndrome, patients on dialysis, and patients with kidney transplants. Certainly, cooperation between the dentist and nephrologist is an imperative for the appropriate dental treatment of patients with grossly impaired renal function.

Antibiotics represent a powerful weapon against infections. As dentists we are faced almost on a daily basis with the need to prescribe antibiotics. At the same time, we can often see that the antibiotics use tends to get out of control or that they are used indiscriminately with no real need. The aim of this case study is to investigate the effectiveness of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid combination in various dental ailments but also to demonstrate possible difference in the severity of symptoms after the use of amoxicillin and antibiotic combination of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid after surgical and oral interventions. The investigation involved 102 patients who were divided into two groups (the first group consisting of 59 and the second one of 43 patients). Following surgical treatment the first group of patients was prescribed antibiotic combination of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid in the dosage of 625 mg, 3 times per day. The second group of 43 patients was prescribed amoxicillin in the dosage of 500 mg, 4 times per day. The recommended therapy for antibiotic combination of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid was 5 to 10 days after the operation and 8 to 10 days for amoxicillin. In other words, both groups of patients started to use antibiotics after the surgical or oral intervention such as operative removal of impacted wisdom teeth, apicoectomy or complicated extractions, and also after the treatment of odontogenic abscesses etc. The same parameters were measured prior to the surgical intervention in cases when patients demonstrated the symptoms before the operational treatment while in all other cases the parameters were measured 48 hours and seven days following the operation. The measured parameters were: pain, swelling, body temperature, dysfunction such as dysphagus trismus, chewing disorder and possible allergic or gastrointestinal reactions. All parameters observed were precisely set in order to harmonize the investigation criteria and facilitate statistical data processing. With respect to pain before the operation there was no substantial statistical difference, p>0.05 (t=0.56; t=0.69). With respect to the onset of pain and the use of antibiotics after 48 hours there is a significant difference in favor of antibiotic combination of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid (X= 14.83, p= 0.002; p <0.01). Thus, pain is less acute if antibiotic combination of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid is administered. With respect to swelling and administration of antibiotics 48 hours after the operation there is no significant difference between the use of the two antibiotic therapies (X= 4.89; p=0.18; p>0.05). The investigation conducted seven days after the operation with regard to pain and the use of either antibiotic therapies demonstrated significant statistical difference (X=9.35, p<0.01) in favor of antibiotic combination of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid. In other words, patients who used amoxicillin and clavulanic acid felt significantly less intense pain. With respect to swelling, significant statistical difference between the two groups of patients was established in favor of antibiotic combination of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid, i.e. p<0.05 (X=6.45, p=0.03). The combination of amoxicillin and clavulanic has proven to be significantly more effective in comparison with the use of amoxicillin after oral-surgical interventions, and therefore antibiotic combination of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid is recommended for use in further practice.