Lifting table has been designed and developed through the concept of Learning Factory (LF) at the University of Mostar. The idea for lifting table design has come from the local industry needs for a lifting platform that should lift a man and/or load at a certain height. For safety reasons, design is checked under the loading using a method of finite element analysis. The paper predicts and explains methodology for structural analysis used in presented case study. Results of FEM analysis are basis for making ways and guidelines to optimize current design in order to get optimal parameters for weight, stability, capacity, mobility and layout of the lifting table.

This paper describes the analysis of steel reel shaft as drive shaft in a process of umbilical spooling of wire rope. There is a need to investigate shaft behaviour in the conditions of increasing workload. The aim is to investigate avoiding possible redesign or enabling redesign with minimal costs. Stress analysis has been carried out by using finite element analysis (FEA) and results are compared with the analytically calculated values. Finite element analysis has been carried out using maximum stress criteria and the area of potential failure is found. The main objective of this paper is to find balance in results between "design by rule" and "design by analysis". Design by rule provides rules on how to design a steel reel shaft using analytical equations and other strict rules from design elements. Design by analysis provides rules on using numerical analysis, typically finite element analysis to design a steel reel shaft. The steel reel shaft has been geometrically modelled using SolidWorks. To check all stresses, linear static analysis is done using DSS Simulation and Ansys.

A power uprate of the nuclear power plant will affect some systems, which will be exposed to new loads, transients and operating parameters. After defining of new loads, transients and operating conditions, work to qualify a system begins with modelling of this pipe system as well as modelling of supports which are active in the system. Pipe supports in pipe model are defined depending on the supports function and also their correct stiffness. After analysis is done, reaction forces are obtained in points where pipe supports are defined in the pipe model. Reaction forces from pipestress analysis, in the points where pipe supports are defined, becomes attacking forces in pipe supports analysis. A complete calculation of support is explained as well as the way to use required standard. The calculation includes stiffness calculation, calculation of membrane stress and membrane plus bending stress. In order to qualify the support a limit load analysis is performed. Finally, it is showed that pipe support could be qualified according to the standard ASME NF-3200. This paper describes use of software Pipestress and Ansys in stress analysis of piping systems and pipe supports.

Micro cracks have been found near some of the welds on the pipe unit. This paper investigates the root cause of this damage and suggests improvements to prevent such damage from occurring. The investigation includes several simulations using Pipestress and Ansys Mechanical, a welding and materials investigation, and a more theoretical creep investigation using the Larson-Miller parameter. A sensitivity study of the outlet pigtail installation and support configuration is performed as well as a cyclic plastic analysis. A complementary analysis of the catalyst tubes, inlet and outlet system shows that the only areas where the stress and strain indicate an elevated risk of damage are the areas around the ends of the outlet pigtails. Suggested improvements include reconfiguration and load reduction of constant hanger supports, improving welding procedures in order to lower residual stresses and undertake more material and on site investigations to verify causes of failure. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 04.01.2018 Accepted 22.02.2018 Available 15.03.2018

Original scientific paper Development of technology and new media affects the newspaper industry so that it results in decline of newspaper publication circulation. Suitable methods and tools to improve quality management system have been looked for to ensure sustainability and reduce the costs in newspaper production. Well-known systems of quality management such as ISO 9001, TQM, Lean manufacturing and QFD methods – Quality Function Deployment, are ubiquitous in production systems around the world. Each production system, including the system of newspaper production must meet the customer’s requirements and all other value chain participants by recognizing the newspaper product properties. Although the QFD method is mainly used for developing a new product, this paper explores the possibility of its implementation in the newspaper production. It affects the improvement of the production process by acting preventively to detect compatibility. By examining the effects of certain tools in certain segments of the newspaper production system and their adaptation, a new method was developed modified QFD, tested in the newspaper printing houses the research was conducted in. The method can be implemented in the newspaper production systems and thus make production processes more efficient and ensure sustainable business.

The globalization of different levels complexity product markets, communication and transport links and outstanding ease and availability of delivery services impose a simple question how enterprise in Bosnia and Herzegovina can remain competitive in a seaway dynamics of an economy? Specific challenges have been set to small and medium enterprises that used to be competitive in the local market, which in this day and age is no longer an applicable strategy for survival. To maintain their share in the global market, companies must create a sound methodology and systematic approach to product development. Precisely such an important and essential role plays concurrent engineering methodology as a relatively new approach to product and/or process development. The paper presents the practical example of the EPU32 machine redesign from Jelsingrad manufacturer, in order to increase its productivity.

The globalization of different levels complexity product markets, communication and transport links and outstanding ease and availability of delivery services impose a simple question - how enterprise in Bosnia and Herzegovina can remain competitive in a seaway dynamics of an economy? Specific challenges have been set to small and medium enterprises that used to be competitive in the local market, which in this day and age is no longer an applicable strategy for survival. To maintain their share in the global market, companies must create a sound methodology and systematic approach to product development. Precisely such an important and essential role plays concurrent engineering methodology as a relatively new approach to product and/or process development. The paper presents the practical example of the EPU32 machine redesign from Jelsingrad manufacturer, in order to increase its productivity.

Concurrent engineering methodology includes the product development model and the production process development model. These models use concurrent engineering as their overriding philosophy, strengthened by the use of a systematic design process. Process design model generally consists of three different models: the manufacturing process development model, the test method development model, and the packaging development model. This model has five development phases: project planning, conceptual design, design, production preparation, and production/service. Between each of these five development phases, there is a management milestone, which is an approval point for the management team to assess the progress of the project. Each of the phases are broken into steps. The process development model starts with a kick-off meeting in conjunction with the product development model. This meeting is used to develop a broad overview of the development methodology and the expectations of the product. Next, the teams begin their own tasks, but communicate their progress regularly. Finally, production/service, the last phase of both the product and the process development models is the phase in which the product is manufactured, tested, packaged, and distributed to customers.