Regulatorna tijela Bosne i Hercegovine koja su se pojavila u posljednjih dvadesetak godina u procesu intenzivne agencifikacije i u toj državi većinom su neistražena pojava. Stoga je cilj ovoga rada utvrditi koje su od velika broja agencija te države regulatori, kakve imaju ovlasti i neovisnost, kojem komparativnom modelu pripadaju, a posebice postoji li uopće model bosanskohercegovačkog regulatora. S tom su svrhom uspoređeni regulatorni modeli određenih država od posebne važnosti i analizirana pitanja neovisnosti i sadržaja regulatornih ovlasti. Utvrđeno je postojanje sedam regulatornih agencija na središnjoj razini vlasti te da je većina bosanskohercegovačkih regulatora dio državne uprave. Osim toga, neovisnost pojedinih regulatora jako varira – od relativno visoke u području energije i komunikacija do niske u reguliranju željezničkog prometa, pri čemu pojedini regulatori imaju različite uzore, od angloameričkih do europskokontinentalnih, te je konačan zaključak da model bosanskohercegovačkog regulatora uopće ne postoji.

This paper explores the legal regulations on the termination of pregnancy in comparative law, a sensitive topic that, although it does represent the exclusive domain of state regulation, encroaches into human rights as well. The basic research question is how selected modern democratic states legally regulate the issue of the termination of pregnancy. Hence, the research goal is to prove that the trend of modern democratic states is to allow the termination of pregnancy even on request, but also to determine the existence of recent retrograde trends in this area. In this paper and research, except for the comparative method, the analytic, dogmatic, normative, and axiological methods are utilized. Although the core of the research is comparative legal, the historic and international legal segments are presented in short in this paper. In researching the following selected states, BiH, Serbia, Croatia, Germany, USA and Ireland, it is determined that the termination of pregnancy is currently largely allowed even on the request of a pregnant woman, especially for justified reasons, with regards to a specific legal regime (Germany), a sudden shift in complete liberalization (Ireland), and even for retrograde changes towards absolute prohibition (USA). In the argument section, the right of the state to ban a medical procedure out of arbitrary reasons (at least in modern discourse) is considered (even disputed). The conclusion is, considering the practice and development of democratic states, the trend of allowing the termination of pregnancy in early stages on demand of a pregnant woman without a reason, and in later stages with a reason, is evident. Concerning the region, the situation is relative satisfactory, although in greater parts of Bosnia and Herzegovina as well as Croatia the outdated legislation needs innovations, as well as certain improvements, which at this point is inevitable.

This paper researches the decisions of the Council of Ministers of Bosnia and Herzegovina as general sub-laws and compares them with regulations of governments on other levels of government in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The comparison of the decisions of the Council of Ministers is carried out with the regulations of the Government of the Federation and the Government of Sarajevo Canton, with the intention to determine that decisions of the Council of Ministers have in essence the same scope and subject of regulating as the aforementioned government regulations, placing emphasis on the constitutional distribution of competencies between state, entities and cantons. The original research has determined that the Council of Ministers carries out the majority of legislative activities with their decisions, but rulebooks and instructions also appear as sub-laws, which isn’t the case on federal and cantonal levels, where rulebooks and instructions are exclusively adopted by administrative bodies, although administrative bodies on the level of Bosnia and Herzegovina also adopt these types of legislation. It has been determined that most decisions, rulebooks and instructions of the Council of Ministers, as well as regulations of governments are adopted for the purpose of executing the law, therefore as classical sub-laws, although different examples also appear. Finally, an amendment to the law is proposed in the sense that the Council of Ministers adopts regulations as sub-laws, with the cessation of adoption of rulebooks and instructions, which would be more appropriate from the aspect of our administrative law and bring about more order and would systematise this area.