Two-Dimensional LC × DMS Analysis of 34 PFAS Compounds.

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are ubiquitous environmental pollutants that pose potential risks to ecosystems and human health. Prior to mass spectrometric analysis of environmental samples, it is necessary to separate PFAS from compounds that can cause ion suppression and compromise analyte identification and quantification accuracy. Although liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) is the gold standard for PFAS trace analysis, some PFAS species still coelute in the LC dimension and could benefit from an orthogonal dimension of separation. Moreover, an additional orthogonal dimension of separation could potentially aid in the identification of unknown fluorinated species (e.g., those identified within a specified mass-defect range). Here, we investigate the sequential use of LC and differential mobility spectrometry (DMS) separation to analyze 34 PFAS species. Upon incorporating DMS in a two-dimensional (2D) separation scheme, we observed baseline resolution of 29 compounds in the 2D LC × DMS space, with partial resolution of the remaining five. In comparison, only five PFAS compounds were baseline-resolved in 1D LC experiments. Because DMS measurements can be acquired in milliseconds, targeted 2D LC × DMS-MS2 analyses operate on the same time scale as LC-MS2 analysis. However, the limits of quantitation for PFAS using the 2D LC × DMS-MS2 method are slightly higher than those achieved by the state-of-the-art LC-MS2 method owing to ion fragmentation within the energetic DMS environment. Nevertheless, distinct trends observed in the 2D separation space for the various PFAS subclasses will facilitate analyte identification of unknown species in future nontargeted analyses. Finally, we assessed the feasibility of our method for quantifying PFAS in a series of wastewater samples obtained from a Southern Ontario wastewater treatment plant. We were successful in quantifying PFOS, although the concentrations determined were consistently higher than those measured with LC-MS2.