Bridging the Rift: A Critical Perspective on the Divergence in Group Recommender Systems Research
Group recommender systems (GRSys) focus on the challenges of recommending to groups of users with possibly contradicting needs and preferences. Methodologically, we distinguish between approaches aiming to aggregate preferences of group members and aggregating per-user recommendations. In early GRSys research, this methodological duality did not affect the connected research objectives and evaluation methodology much. However, nowadays, we witness a gradual rift in the research induced by both algorithm classes. In this work, based on a survey of 110 recent GRSys papers, we aim to quantify this rift along several aspects, including involved communities, evaluation datasets, objectives, and baselines. We showcase how little both subtrees have in common nowadays and discuss missed opportunities this rift causes. In conclusion, we also highlight novel research avenues that may contribute towards bridging the rift to the benefit of both research areas.