Logo
Nazad
John J. Reilly, Rachel Andrew, Chalchisa Abdeta, Liane B Azevedo, N. A. Farias, S. Barak, Farid Bardid, Bruno Bizzozero-Peroni, J. Brazo-Sayavera, Jonathan Y. Cagas, M. Chelly, L. B. Christiansen, Visnja D Djordjic, Catherine E. Draper, Asmae Elhamdouchi, E. Fares, A. Gába, Kylie D Hesketh, M. S. Hossain, Wendy Huang, Alejandra Jáuregui, Sanjay K Juvekar, Nicholas Kuzik, R. Larouche, Eun-Young Lee, Sharon Levi, Yang Liu, Marie Löf, T. Loney, Jose Francisco Lopez Gil, Evelin Mäestu, Taru Manyanga, Clarice Martins, María Mendoza-Muñoz, S. Morrison, N. Munambah, Tawonga W. Mwase-Vuma, R. Naidoo, Reginald Ocansey, Anthony D. Okely, Aoko Oluwayomi, S. Paudel, B.K. Poh, E. H. Ribeiro, Diego Augusto Santos Silva, M. Shahril, Melody Smith, A. Staiano, M. Standage, Narayan Subedi, Chiaki Tanaka, Hong K. Tang, D. Thivel, Mark S. Tremblay, E. Užičanin, D. Vlachopoulos, E. K. Webster, Dyah Anantalia Widyastari, Pawel Zembura, Salomé Aubert
0 3. 10. 2024.

Improving National and International Surveillance of Movement Behaviours in Childhood and Adolescence: An International Modified Delphi Study

Background The actions required to achieve higher-quality and harmonised global surveillance of child and adolescent movement behaviours (physical activity, sedentary behaviour including screen time, sleep) are unclear. Objective To identify how to improve surveillance of movement behaviours, from the perspective of experts. Methods This Delphi Study involved 62 experts from the SUNRISE International Study of Movement Behaviours in the Early Years and Active Healthy Kids Global Alliance (AHKGA). Two survey rounds were used, with items categorised under: (1) funding, (2) capacity building, (3) methods, and (4) other issues (e.g., policymaker awareness of relevant WHO Guidelines and Strategies). Expert participants ranked 40 items on a five-point Likert scale from ‘extremely’ to ‘not at all’ important. Consensus was defined as > 70% rating of ‘extremely’ or ‘very’ important. Results We received 62 responses to round 1 of the survey and 59 to round 2. There was consensus for most items. The two highest rated round 2 items in each category were the following; for funding (1) it was greater funding for surveillance and public funding of surveillance; for capacity building (2) it was increased human capacity for surveillance (e.g. knowledge, skills) and regional or global partnerships to support national surveillance; for methods (3) it was standard protocols for surveillance measures and improved measurement method for screen time; and for other issues (4) it was greater awareness of physical activity guidelines and strategies from WHO and greater awareness of the importance of surveillance for NCD prevention. We generally found no significant differences in priorities between low-middle-income (n = 29) and high-income countries (n = 30) or between SUNRISE (n = 20), AHKGA (n = 26) or both (n = 13) initiatives. There was a lack of agreement on using private funding for surveillance or surveillance research. Conclusions This study provides a prioritised and international consensus list of actions required to improve surveillance of movement behaviours in children and adolescents globally. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40279-024-02104-2.


Pretplatite se na novosti o BH Akademskom Imeniku

Ova stranica koristi kolačiće da bi vam pružila najbolje iskustvo

Saznaj više