Validation and comparison of clinical predictive scores for testicular torsion in children with acute scrotum

Background: Testicular torsion scoring systems, based on a combination of clinical and imaging factors, have been developed to improve the diagnostic accuracy of testicular torsion in patients presenting with acute scrotum. This study aimed to validate and compare two current testicular torsion scores the Boettcher Alert Score (BAL) and the Testicular Workup for Ischemia and Suspected Torsion (TWIST)-in a retrospective cohort of pediatric patients with acute scrotum. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of all pediatric patients admitted to our institution for acute scrotum between January 2010 and December 2022. Patients were categorized into the testicular torsion (TT) group and the non-testicular torsion (NTT) group. Collected data were used to calculate the scoring systems and perform statistical analyses. Results: A total of 241 patients were included, of whom 80 (33.2%) had testicular torsion. The mean age in the TT group was 13 years. The optimal individual cut-off value for the BAL score was >1 (sensitivity 90%, specificity 80.75%), and for the TWIST score >4 (sensitivity 82.5%, specificity 80.75%). A high-risk TWIST score >5 had a specificity of 80.75% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 90.28%, while a BAL score of 4 showed a specificity of 98.48% and NPV of 94.2%. The area under the ROC curve was slightly higher for the BAL score (0.917; 95% CI, 0.875–0.949) than for the TWIST score (0.897; 95% CI, 0.851–0.932). The difference between the two scores was not statistically significant. Conclusion: The TWIST and BAL clinical scores have significant diagnostic value and may assist in the evaluation of testicular torsion in children. Both scores could be incorporated into a standardized approach for assessing pediatric acute scrotum, potentially reducing time to definitive diagnosis, and minimizing ischemia duration.