Comparison of Nutritional Status Between Nursing Home Residents and Community Dwelling Older Adults: a Cross-Sectional Study from Bosnia and Herzegovina

Aim: The aim of the study was to determine the differences in nutritional status and risk for malnutrition between nursing home and community-dwelling residents. Methods: Cross-sectional study included 146 nursing home residents and 300 community-dwelling elderly adults from four municipalities in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Anthropometric measurements, biochemical analyses, nutritive, functional and cognitive assessments were carried out. Nutritional status and risk for malnutrition were assessed by Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), Seniors in the Community: Risk Evaluation for Eating and Nutrition, version II (Screen II) and the food intake analysis for the past 24 hours. Functional status was assessed by the Lawton scale, the Katz Independence Index, Timed Up and Go test, the Functional Reach Test. Mini Cog test and Six-item cognitive impairment test were used for the evaluation of cognitive functioning. Results: The incidence of high nutritive risk by SCREEN II (100%) and being “at risk for malnutrition” by MNA (81.60%) was higher among nursing home residents compared to community-dwellers. Community-dwelling elderly people had higher BMI (27.94 ± 4.73), weight (78.40 ± 13.99), height (167.69 ± 9.74), waist circumference (97.77 ± 12.88), hip circumference (104.61 ± 11.47), mid-arm arm (27.54 ± 3.58), hip (27.54 ± 3.58) and calf circumference (34.02 ± 5.16 ). Statistical differences in regards to place of living were found in functional status (p<0.001), cognitive functioning (p<0.001) and hand grip strength (p<0.001). Conclusion: The frequency of malnutrition and high nutritional risk was higher in respondents who were living in the nursing homes compared to community-dwellers. The results of this study showed that health professionals involved in the care for institutionalized elderly people should implement routine screening of malnutrition within the comprehensive geriatric assessment in their daily practice.