EEG-fTCD hybrid brain–computer interface using template matching and wavelet decomposition

Objective. We aim at developing a hybrid brain–computer interface that utilizes electroencephalography (EEG) and functional transcranial Doppler (fTCD). In this hybrid BCI, EEG and fTCD are used simultaneously to measure electrical brain activity and cerebral blood velocity respectively in response to flickering mental rotation (MR) and word generation (WG) tasks. In this paper, we improve both the accuracy and information transfer rate (ITR) of this novel hybrid brain computer interface (BCI) we designed in our previous work. Approach. To achieve such aim, we extended our feature extraction approach through using template matching and multi-scale analysis to extract EEG and fTCD features, respectively. In particular, template matching was used to analyze EEG data whereas 5-level wavelet decomposition was applied to fTCD data. Significant EEG and fTCD features were selected using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Support vector machines classifier (SVM) was used to project EEG and fTCD selected features of each trial into scalar SVM scores. Moreover, instead of concatenating EEG and fTCD feature vectors corresponding to each trial, we proposed a Bayesian fusion approach of EEG and fTCD evidences. Main results. Average accuracy and average ITR of 98.11% and 21.29 bits min−1 were achieved for WG versus MR classification while MR versus baseline yielded 86.27% average accuracy and 8.95 bit min−1 average ITR. In addition, average accuracy of 85.29% and average ITR of 8.34 bits min−1 were obtained for WG versus baseline. Significance. The proposed analysis techniques significantly improved the hybrid BCI performance. Specifically, for MR/WG versus baseline problems, we achieved twice of the ITRs obtained in our previous study. Moreover, the ITR of WG versus MR problem is 4-times the ITR we obtained before for the same problem. The current analysis methods boosted the performance of our EEG-fTCD BCI such that it outperformed the existing EEG-fNIRS BCIs in comparison.