Comparative Analysis of Basal vs. Apical Left Ventricular Aneurysms: Impact on Ejection Fraction and Cardiac Function

Background and Objectives: Left ventricular aneurysm (LVA) is associated with a decline in cardiac function, evidenced by a lower ejection fraction (EF), due to the reduction in the proportion of functional myocardium. The left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), the left ventricular aneurysm volume (LVAV), and the LVAV/LVEDV ratio show a strong correlation with the EF. The aim of this study was to determine LVA characteristics post-myocardial infarction (basal vs. apical) and to evaluate the impact of aneurysm volume in diastole (LVAVd), aneurysm area in diastole (LVAAd), and their respective ratios with LVEDV and area (LVEDA) on the EF, in order to identify the most critical predictive factors for assessing and managing the negative impact of aneurysms on cardiac function. Materials and Methods: This observational study included post-infarction LVA patients at the “Dedinje” Cardiovascular Institute in Belgrade, Serbia, undergoing routine transthoracic echocardiography. Echocardiography assessed volumes (LVEDV, LVESV, LVAVd, LVAVs) and areas (LVAAd, LVAAs, LVEDA, LVESA) using the area–length method. The ratios (LVAVd/LVEDV, LVAVs/LVESV, LVAAd/LVEDA, LVAAs/LVESA) were derived from these measures. The left ventricular EF was calculated using Simpson’s method. Results: Basal aneurysms showed a significantly smaller LVAVd (p = 0.016), LVAAd (p = 0.003), and LVAAs (p = 0.029) compared to apical aneurysms, indicating that basal aneurysms are smaller in size. However, there was no significant difference in the EF and overall LV volumes between the groups, although the basal aneurysm group had a slightly higher EF and end-diastolic volume, with a slightly lower end-systolic volume. Furthermore, when comparing the correlation between the EF and the LVAVd, the LVEDV, and the LVAVd/LVEDV ratio, the results indicate that the LVAVd had the greatest impact on the EF (−0.695), followed by the LVAVd/LVEDV ratio (−0.637), and the lowest correlation is between the EF and LVEDV. A similar relationship is observed when comparing the EF with the LVESV, the LVAVs, and the LVAVs/LVESV ratio. Conclusions: Basal aneurysms are significantly smaller than apical ones, yet EF and LV volumes remain similar between the groups, with the EF being slightly higher in the basal group. In cases of LVA, LVAVd shows the strongest negative correlation with the EF, indicating its significant impact on systolic function, followed by the LVAVd/LVEDV ratio, with the weakest correlation seen between the EF and LVEDV.